Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051524›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2022

After-action review of rabies and anthrax outbreaks multisectoral response in Tanzania, challenges and lessons.

Kunda John Stephen, Justine Assenga, Jubilate Bernard, Ernest Eblate, Elibariki Mwakapeje, Janneth Mghamba, Harrison Chinyuka, Dominic Kambarage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kunda John StephenNational Institute for Medical Research, Muhimbili Medical Research Centre, Dar es Salaam.
Justine AssengaOne Health Coordination Desk, Prime Minister's Office, Dodoma.
Jubilate BernardOne Health Coordination Desk, Prime Minister's Office, Dodoma.
Ernest EblateTanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha.
Elibariki MwakapejeMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma.
Janneth MghambaMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma.
Harrison ChinyukaOne Health Coordination Desk, Prime Minister's Office, Dodoma.
Dominic KambarageSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro.
Prime Minister's Office · BNMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZSokoine University of Agriculture · TZTanzania Wildlife Research Institute · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After-action review uses experiences gained from past events to adopt best practices, thereby improving future interventions. In December 2016 and late 2018, the government of Tanzania with support from partners responded to anthrax and rabies outbreaks in Arusha and Morogoro regions respectively. The One Health Coordination Desk (OHCD) of the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) later coordinated after-action reviews to review the multi-sectoral preparedness and response to the outbreaks. To establish and describe actions undertaken by the multi-sectoral investigation and response teams during planning and deployment, execution of field activities, and outbreak investigation and response, system best practices and deficiencies. These were cross-sectional surveys. Semi-structured, open and closed-ended questionnaire and focus group discussions were administered to collect information from responders at the national and subnational levels. It was found that the surveillance and response systems were weak at community level, lack of enforcement of public health laws including vaccination of livestock and domestic animals and joint preparedness efforts were generally undermined by differential disease surveillance capacities among sectors. Lack of resources in particular funds for supplies, transport and deployment of response teams contributed to many shortfalls. The findings underpin the importance of after-action reviews in identifying critical areas for improvement in multi-sectoral prevention and control of disease outbreaks. Main sectors under the coordination of the OHCD should include after action reviews in their plans and budget it as a tool to continuously assess and improve multi-sectoral preparedness and response to public health emergencies.

Indexed as

after-action reviewOutbreaksresponse

Identifiers

PMID36051524
PMCPMC9425926
OpenAlexW4288066941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.