Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051503›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2022

Who is prescribed valproate and how carefully is this treatment reviewed in UK mental health services? Data from a clinical audit.

Carol Paton, Leslie Citrome, Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Olivia Rendora, Thomas R E Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prescription of sodium valproate to women of childbearing potential in Southern District Mental Health Services in New Zealand.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carol PatonPrescribing Observatory for Mental Health, Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, 21 Prescot Street, Whitechapel, London E1 8BB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-1031
Leslie CitromeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, New York Medical College, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-9266
Emilio Fernandez-EgeaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Olivia RendoraPrescribing Observatory for Mental Health, Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Thomas R E BarnesDivision of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-656X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The licensed indications for valproate are narrow, yet this medication is commonly prescribed in mental health services. Objectives: To explore the target symptoms/behaviours for which valproate is prescribed and how well the efficacy and tolerability of this treatment are monitored in routine clinical practice. Design: An audit-based quality improvement (QI) programme in UK mental health services. Methods: Information on valproate prescribing was collected from clinical records using a bespoke data collection tool. Results: Sixty-four NHS mental health Trusts/healthcare organisations submitted data on valproate treatment for 5320 patients. Valproate was clearly prescribed for a licensed indication in 1995 (38%) patients, off-label in 1987 (37%) while the indication was uncertain/not available in 1338 (25%). Of the 919 patients started on valproate treatment within the past year, between a half and two-thirds had each of the relevant baseline physical health checks documented. In 539 (59%) of these patients, valproate was prescribed for an unlicensed indication; the prescription was recognised as off-label in 363 (67%), 20 (6%) of whom were documented as having had this explained to them. Of 631 patients prescribed valproate for between 3 months and a year, early on-treatment assessments of response and side effects were documented in 441 (70%) and 332 (53%), respectively. Of 4401 patients treated for more than a year, annual on-treatment reviews of clinical response and side effects were documented in 2771 (63%) and 2140 (49%), respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggest the majority of prescriptions for valproate in mental health services are not for a licensed indication. Furthermore, patients rarely receive an explanation that their valproate prescription is off-label, perhaps partly because the licensed indications are not widely understood by prescribers. Given the very limited evidence for efficacy for the off-label uses of valproate, failure to routinely conduct early on-treatment and annual reviews of the benefits and side effects of this medication may result in patients remaining on ineffective and poorly tolerated treatment by default.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderoff-labelpersonality disorderschizophreniatreatment monitoringvalproate

Identifiers

PMID36051503
PMCPMC9425878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.