Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051450›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2022

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: Is it getting ready for prime time?

Vincenzo Li Marzi, Alessio Pecoraro, Maria Lucia Gallo, Leonardo Caroti, Adriano Peris, Graziano Vignolini, Sergio Serni, Riccardo Campi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincenzo Li MarziDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy. limarzi2012@gmail.com.
Alessio PecoraroDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.
Maria Lucia GalloDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.
Leonardo CarotiNephrology Unit, Careggi Hospital, Florence 50134, Italy.
Adriano PerisIntensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Careggi Hospital, Florence 50134, Italy.
Graziano VignoliniDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.
Sergio SerniDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.
Riccardo CampiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · ITCreative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, providing a better survival rate and quality of life compared to dialysis. Despite the progress in the medical management of KT patients, from a purely surgical standpoint, KT has resisted innovations during the last 50 years. Recently, robot-assisted KT (RAKT) has been proposed as an alternative approach to open surgery, especially due to its potential benefits for fragile and immunocompromised recipients. It was not until 2014 that the role of RAKT has found value thanks to the pioneering Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta collaboration that conceptualized and developed a new surgical technique for RAKT following the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up recommendations for introducing surgical innovations into real-life practice. During the last years, mirroring the Vattikuti-Medanta technique, several centers developed RAKT program worldwide, providing strong evidence about the safety and the feasibility of this procedure. However, the majority of RAKT are still performed in the living donor setting, as an "eligible" procedure, while only a few centers have realized KT through a robotic approach in the challenging scenario of cadaver donation. In addition, despite the spread of minimally-invasive (predominantly robotic) surgery worldwide, many KTs are still performed in an open fashion. Regardless of the type of incision employed by surgeons, open KT may lead to non-negligible risks of wound complications, especially among obese patients. Particularly, the assessment for KT should consider not only the added surgical technical challenges but also the higher risk of postoperative complications. In this context, robotic surgery could offer several benefits, including providing a better exposure of the surgical field and better instrument maneuverability, as well as the possibility to integrate other technological nuances, such as the use of intraoperative fluorescence vascular imaging with indocyanine green to assess the ureteral vascularization before the uretero-vesical anastomosis. Therefore, our review aims to report the more significant experiences regarding RAKT, focusing on the results and future perspectives.

Indexed as

Deceased donorsKidney transplantationLiving donorsMinimally invasive surgeryRobotics

Identifiers

PMID36051450
PMCPMC9331411
OpenAlexW4285490464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.