Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051400›Full record

ArticleThe journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM

Quantitative Echocardiography Improves Resident Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function.

Andrew H Wu, Harshika Chowdhary, Matthew Fischer, Ali Salehi, Tristan Grogan, Louis Saddic, Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew H WuThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Harshika ChowdharyThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Matthew FischerThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Ali SalehiThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Tristan GroganThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Louis SaddicThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Jacques NeelankavilThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
Reed HarveyThe authors are at the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles, CA. is a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist; is a medical student; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a clinical statistician; is a cardiac anesthesiologist; is a cardiac anetshesiologist; is a cardiac anesthesiologist.
American Society of Anesthesiologists · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques. Methods: We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value. Results: Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97;

Indexed as

educational techniquesmedical educationTransthoracic echocardiographyventricular ejection fraction

Identifiers

PMID36051400
PMCPMC9426259
OpenAlexW4289784947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.