Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051311›Full record

ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2022

Recent Advances in Machine Learning Variant Effect Prediction Tools for Protein Engineering.

Jesse Horne, Diwakar Shukla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enzyme structure correlates with variant effect predictability.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  13. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in generative models for antibodies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Pseudo-perplexity in One Fell Swoop for Protein Fitness Estimation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Representing mutations for predicting cancer drug response.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesse HorneDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5941-9944
Diwakar ShuklaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61801, United States; Department of Plant Biology, Cancer Center at Illinois, and Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-5381
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Training Program in Chemistry-Interface with BiologyT32GM070421 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HERGENROTHER, PAUL · 2005 to 2019
$5.4M
Elucidating sequence, structural and dynamic basis of the functional regulation of membrane proteinsR35GM142745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SHUKLA, DIWAKAR · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142745NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM070421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are Nature's molecular machinery and comprise diverse roles while consisting of chemically similar building blocks. In recent years, protein engineering and design have become important research areas, with many applications in the pharmaceutical, energy, and biocatalysis fields, among others-where the aim is to ultimately create a protein given desired structural and functional properties. It is often critical to model the relationship between a protein's sequence, folded structure, and biological function to assist in such protein engineering pursuits. However, significant challenges remain in concretely mapping an amino acid sequence to specific protein properties and biological activities. Mutations may enhance or diminish molecular protein function, and the epistatic interactions between mutations result in an inherently complex mapping between genetic modifications and protein function. Therefore, estimating the quantitative effects of mutations on protein function(s) remains a grand challenge of biology, bioinformatics, and many related fields and would rapidly accelerate protein engineering tasks when successful. Such estimation is often known as variant effect prediction (VEP). However, progress has been demonstrated in recent years with the development of machine learning (ML) methods in modeling the relationship between mutations and protein function. In this Review, recent advances in variant effect prediction (VEP) are discussed as tools for protein engineering, focusing on techniques incorporating gains from the broader ML community and challenges in estimating biomolecular functional differences. Primary developments highlighted include convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, and natural language embeddings for protein sequences.

Identifiers

PMID36051311
PMCPMC9432854
OpenAlexW4225930681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.