ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
The combined influence of rootstock and vintage climate on the grape and wine flavonoids of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Root-zone waterproof cultivation advanced coloring by accumulation anthocyanins and modulated epiphytic bacteria rebuilding in Marselan grape.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Sugar stress attenuates fruity aroma in sweet wine by suppressing ethyl ester biosynthesis: Insights from integrated sensory, metabolome, and transcriptomic analyses.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Effects of Different Rootstocks on Graft Compatibility, Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Table Grape 'Fengguang'.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- High-Vigor Rootstock Exacerbates Herbaceous Notes inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of Natural Variation and Rootstock on Fruit Quality and Volatile Organic Compounds of 'International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rootstocks are commonly utilized owing to their resistance to abiotic and biotic stress in viticulture. This study evaluated the effects of three rootstocks (1103P, SO4, and 5A) on the Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) vine growth, and their berries and wines flavonoids profiles in four consecutive vintages. The results showed that 1103P increased the pruning weight of CS and decreased the anthocyanin concentration in berries and wines, especially in the vintages with more rainy and cloudy days. 5A tended to decrease the pruning weight of CS and increase the anthocyanin concentration in berries and wines. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) showed that the concentrations of total anthocyanins, F3'H-anthocyanins, malvidin-3-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.