Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051255›Full record

ArticleScanning2022

Nursing Education of Lateral Oblique Complications of Neurosurgery under Microscope.

Kecui Hu

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Scanning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kecui HuSchool of Nursing, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui 230012, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-9322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to solve the problem of nursing education of lateral oblique complications, a nursing education solution of lateral oblique complications of neurosurgery under the microscope was proposed. The method used subjective evaluation and objective evaluation to systematically evaluate the basic training module. In subjective evaluation, the authenticity score of surgical simulator was 3.65 ± 0.01, the realism score of surgical instruments was 3.81 ± 0.01, the realism score of tactile sense was 3.75 ± 0.01, the operating environment score was 3.60 ± 0.01, and the overall effect score was 3.63 ± 0.01. The difficulty score of the whole training was 3.15 ± 0.01. In the aspect of objective evaluation, the entropy method was used to process the data of training track, training angle, training time, trigger times, success times, failure times, and other indicators of 24 trainers collected, and the experiment verified the nursing education of lateral oblique complications of neurosurgery under the microscope.

Indexed as

Education, NursingNeurosurgeryComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID36051255
PMCPMC9410997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.