ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Successful wayfinding in age: A scoping review on spatial navigation training in healthy older adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07225400 (Designing a Spatial Navigation Intervention Protocol Informed by Region-specific Brain Activation for Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Designing a Spatial Navigation Intervention Protocol Informed by Region-specific Brain Activation for Mild Cognitive Impairment
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of embodied learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Virtual Reality-Based Visuospatial Training for Older Adults: System Design and Pilot Evaluation of VR RoomSpace.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of L-Arginine and Creatine Supplementation Combined with Exercise on Hippocampal Neurogenesis, Spatial Learning, and Cognitive Flexibility in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Distinct aging-related profiles of allocentric knowledge recall following navigation in an immersive, naturalistic, city-like environment.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Adult age-group differences in domain-specific environmental appraisal under standardized exposure.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Does injury proneness aid or impair navigation ability? A study on self-reported errors, risk and evaluation behaviors in relation to sense of direction.Cognitive processing · 2025Article
- Separable cognitive and motor decline tracked across adult life-span for goal-directed navigation.iScience · 2025Article
- Spatial navigation skills in older adults with and without cognitive impairment.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- 'Can do' versus 'Do do' in nursing home residents: identification of contextual factors discriminating groups with aligned or misaligned physical activity and physical capacity.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024Article
- Noninvasive modulation of the hippocampal-entorhinal complex during spatial navigation in humans.Science advances · 2024Article
- Development of a real-world simulated instrument for evaluating visuospatial working memory: a preliminary psychometric study on older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the Spatial Navigation and Memory Questionnaire (SPAM).Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spatial navigation is a complex cognitive function that declines in older age. Finding one's way around in familiar and new environments is crucial to live and function independently. However, the current literature illustrates the efficacy of spatial navigation interventions in rehabilitative contexts such as pathological aging and traumatic injury, but an overview of existing training studies for healthy older adults is missing. This scoping review aims to identify current evidence on existing spatial navigation interventions in healthy older adults and analyze their efficacy. Methods: To identify spatial navigation interventions and assessments and investigate their effectiveness, four electronic databases were searched (Pubmed, Web of Science, CINAHL and EMBASE). Two independent reviewers conducted a screening of title, abstract and full-texts and performed a quality assessment. Studies were eligible if (1) published in English, (2) the full text was accessible, (3) at least one group of healthy older adults was included with (4) mean age of 65 years or older, (5) three or more spatial navigation-related training sessions were conducted and (6) at least one spatial ability outcome was reported. Results: Ten studies were included ( Conclusion: The spatial navigation abilities addressed and the measures applied to elicit intervention effects varied in quantity and methodology. Significant improvements were found for at least one spatial ability-related outcome in six of 10 interventions. Two interventions achieved a non-significant positive trend, another revealed no measurable post-training improvement, and one study did not report pre-post-differences. The results indicate that different types of spatial navigation interventions improve components of spatial abilities in healthy older adults. The existing body of research does not allow conclusions on transferability of the trained components on everyday life spatial navigation performance. Future research should focus on reproducing and extending the promising approaches of available evidence. From this, valuable insights on healthy aging could emerge. Trial Registration: This scoping review was preregistered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/m9ab6).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.