Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051171›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of case reports in internal medicine2022

Pseudoshock: A Challenging Presentation of Bilateral Subclavian Artery Stenosis.

Adeel Nasrullah, Romil Singh, Amina Hamza, Briana E DiSilvio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of case reports in internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic Enigma of Blurring Vision and Apparent Shock.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adeel NasrullahDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Romil SinghDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amina HamzaDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Briana E DiSilvioDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Allegheny Health Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Subclavian artery stenosis (SAS) is a manifestation of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Presentation varies, ranging from arm claudication and muscle fatigue to symptoms which reflect vertebrobasilar hypoperfusion, among which are syncope, ataxia and dysphagia. Although rare, severe bilateral SAS can exist and present as refractory hypotension. We describe a case of bilateral SAS masquerading as circulatory shock, or rather 'pseudoshock'. Case Description: A 59-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of dark stools. She was anaemic and hypotensive and therefore suspected to have an acute gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) with resultant haemorrhagic shock. Her hypotension was unresponsive to fluid resuscitation and blood transfusions. Bilateral upper extremity radial artery catheters confirmed low blood pressures. After her blood pressure failed to improve despite the addition of several vasopressors, a femoral artery catheter (FAC) was placed, which revealed significant hypertension discordant with the hypotension measured by the radial artery catheters. Review of CT angiography of the upper extremities revealed the presence of bilateral SAS which was deemed to be the aetiology of the falsely low blood pressure. Discussion: SAS should be suspected in patients with lower extremity PAD or a blood pressure (BP) differential of 15 mmHg or more between arms. When bilateral subclavian arteries are stenosed, this difference in BP may be concealed, making lower extremity BP measurements, as seen in non-invasive tests such as ankle brachial index (ABI) tests or through more invasive procedures such as FAC placement, critically important. Conclusion: Bilateral SAS may present as pseudo-hypotension. In cases of refractory shock of unclear aetiology, especially in patients with known PAD, a high index of suspicion is warranted for 'pseudoshock' secondary to severe vascular stenosis. Comparison of upper and lower extremity BP via invasive arterial catheters or non-invasive ABI tests can aid in the diagnosis of bilateral SAS. LEARNING POINTS: Bilateral subclavian artery stenosis (SAS) may present as pseudo-hypotension and shock of unclear aetiology.In patients with underlying peripheral arterial disease, pseudoshock should be considered in the differential diagnosis.Comparison of upper and lower extremity blood pressure via invasive arterial catheters or the non-invasive ankle brachial index (ABI) test has diagnostic value for bilateral SAS.Pseudoshock is managed via secondary prevention with antiplatelets and statins for asymptomatic patients, and revascularization for symptomatic patients.

Indexed as

Bilateral subclavian artery stenosisperipheral vascular diseasepseudoshockshockvasopressorsvertebrobasilar insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID36051171
PMCPMC9426959
OpenAlexW4287093420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.