ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Influence of the water jet system
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Precision Surgery: The Role of 3D Printing in Liver Surgery.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2026Article
- A randomized comparative study evaluating water-jet with CUSA for parenchymal dissection in living-donor liver procurement: WORLD trial.International journal of surgery protocols · 2025Article
- Harnessing Standing Sound Waves to Treat Intraocular Blood Cell Accumulation.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Case Report: Major right-sided hepatectomies in infants in Uzbekistan: a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic Liver Resection Utilizing a Water Jet Scalpel for Patients With Liver Fibrosis.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Although it has several advantages, such as lower volume of blood loss and shorter operative time, the effect of the WJ system for hepatic dissection on the remnant liver has not yet been investigated.
aimTo investigate and compare the effect of the WJ method
methodsThis observational study compared the two types of parenchymal transection methods (WJ
resultsOn CT scan, the median areas of denaturation in the liver dissection planes were 522 (range: 109.5-1242) mm
conclusionThe WJ group had significantly thinner contrast-enhanced areas in the post hepatectomy detached section than the CUSA group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.