Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051118›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis: A comprehensive overview.

Akash Bansal, Pankaj Gupta, Anupam K Singh, Jimil Shah, Jayanta Samanta, Harshal S Mandavdhare, Vishal Sharma, Saroj Kant Sinha, Usha Dutta, Manavjit Singh Sandhu and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Management of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akash BansalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India. pankajgupta959@gmail.com.
Anupam K SinghDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Jimil ShahDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Jayanta SamantaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Harshal S MandavdhareDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Vishal SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Saroj Kant SinhaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Usha DuttaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Manavjit Singh SandhuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Rakesh KochharDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis is characterized by local and systemic complications. Systemic complications predominate the early phase of acute pancreatitis while local complications are important in the late phase of the disease. Necrotic fluid collections represent the most important local complication. Drainage of these collections is indicated in the setting of infection, persistent or new onset organ failure, compressive or pressure symptoms, and intraabdominal hypertension. Percutaneous, endoscopic, and minimally invasive surgical drainage represents the various methods of drainage with each having its own advantages and disadvantages. These methods are often complementary. In this minireview, we discuss the indications, timing, and techniques of drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with focus on percutaneous catheter drainage. We also discuss the novel methods and techniques to improve the outcomes of percutaneous catheter drainage.

Indexed as

CathetersCollectionsDebridementDrainagePancreatitis, Acute necrotizingStentsTherapeutic irrigation

Identifiers

PMID36051118
PMCPMC9297419
OpenAlexW4283640947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.