ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2022
Perceived risks of over-the-counter medication use among pregnant Saudi mothers: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Self-Medication Awareness During Pregnancy Among Saudi Women in Madinah: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Trends of Over-the-Counter and Prescribed Medication Use During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Women's Perceptions of Medication Use During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Many women use over-the-counter (OTC) medicines, particularly during pregnancy. Therefore, this study investigated the perceived risks of using OTC medicines among pregnant Saudi mothers. Methods: With a cross-sectional design and purposive sampling, the 28-item Drug Use Health Belief Scale was used to collect data from pregnant Saudi mothers (n = 366) in a general tertiary hospital. The data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. After normality testing, the percentages, mean scores, and standard deviations were used to examine the demographic data. One-way ANOVA was used to identify the relationships between perceived risks on the Health Belief Scale and the participants' sociodemographic profile variables. Post-hoc tests were used to identify differences in the independent variables among groups. The statistical significance threshold was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Across the five domains of the Health Belief Scale, the perceived susceptibility domain had the highest rank (0.36). Significant differences were observed between the mean scores of pregnant Saudi mothers' perceptions of susceptibility and the benefits of using OTC medications (p = 0.05), perceptions of susceptibility (p < 0.001), and benefits while using OTC medications (p = 0.018) than those who did not use OTC medications. However, no significant differences were observed in the degree of perceived severity, barriers, and self-efficacy in mothers using OTC medications (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Notable differences were found in pregnant women's perceptions of the risks of using OTC medications. Greater awareness of the risks of OTC medication use during pregnancy is required. To ensure mothers' safety, a collaboration between prenatal multidisciplinary team of professionals (e.g., doctors, nurses, midwives) in community and hospital settings should be prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.