Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050952›Full record

ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2022

Nurses' professional values scale‒three: Validation and psychometric appraisal among Saudi undergraduate student nurses.

Abdulaziz M Alsufyani, Ahmad E Aboshaiqah, Fawzeih A Alshehri, Yasir M Alsufyani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdulaziz M AlsufyaniCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.
Ahmad E AboshaiqahCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.
Fawzeih A AlshehriCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.
Yasir M AlsufyaniCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, KSA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Since the nursing professional values have garnered attention as a principal criterion for safe‒quality nursing practice, it was measured using the Nurses Professional Values Scale‒three. We aimed to validate and ascertain the psychometric indicators of the Arabic version of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-three among Saudi student nurses. Method: This methodological study recruited student nurses using convenience sampling from two nursing colleges at KSA. About 438 valid questionnaires were returned out of 500 questionnaires which were distributed over students in a formal day class time; representing a response rate of 87.6%. A 2‒fold cross‒validation process was adopted. A transcultural process was conducted. Face, content, and construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used. Convergent and discriminant validity were also assessed. The reliability of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Face validity was achieved. The content validity of items ranged from .83 to 1.00, while it was .96 for the overall scale. The exploratory factor analysis yielded a scale containing 28 items with a three‒factor model, explaining 74.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that three‒factor solution had an adequate model fit (CMIN/ Conclusion: Adequate levels of reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-three were established, indicating the appropriateness of using this version to assess the professional values among Saudi and other Arabic‒speaking nurses.

Indexed as

Methodological designNursesNurses' professional values scale–threePracticeProfessional valuesValidation

Identifiers

PMID36050952
PMCPMC9396050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.