Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050765›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

CTCF and cohesin promote focal detachment of DNA from the nuclear lamina.

Tom van Schaik, Ning Qing Liu, Stefano G Manzo, Daan Peric-Hupkes, Elzo de Wit, Bas van Steensel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-wide chromatin recording resolves dynamic cell state changes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Genome architecture and totipotency: An intertwined relation during early embryonic development.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom van SchaikOncode Institute and Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ning Qing LiuOncode Institute and Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stefano G ManzoOncode Institute and Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daan Peric-HupkesOncode Institute and Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elzo de WitOncode Institute and Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bas van SteenselOncode Institute and Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. b.v.steensel@nki.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0284-0404
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

Mapping Technology DevelopmentU54DK107965 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 2015 to 2019
$8.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK107965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLamina-associated domains (LADs) are large genomic regions that are positioned at the nuclear lamina. It has remained largely unclear what drives the positioning and demarcation of LADs. Because the insulator protein CTCF is enriched at LAD borders, it was postulated that CTCF binding could position some LAD boundaries, possibly through its function in stalling cohesin and hence preventing cohesin invading into the LAD. To test this, we mapped genome-nuclear lamina interactions in mouse embryonic stem cells after rapid depletion of CTCF and other perturbations of cohesin dynamics.

resultsCTCF and cohesin contribute to a sharp transition in lamina interactions at LAD borders, while LADs are maintained after depletion of these proteins, also at borders marked by CTCF. CTCF and cohesin may thus reinforce LAD borders, but do not position these. CTCF binding sites within LADs are locally detached from the lamina and enriched for accessible DNA and active histone modifications. Remarkably, despite lamina positioning being strongly correlated with genome inactivity, this DNA remains accessible after the local detachment is lost following CTCF depletion. At a chromosomal scale, cohesin depletion and cohesin stabilization by depletion of the unloading factor WAPL quantitatively affect lamina interactions, indicative of perturbed chromosomal positioning in the nucleus. Finally, while H3K27me3 is locally enriched at CTCF-marked LAD borders, we find no evidence for an interplay between CTCF and H3K27me3 on lamina interactions.

conclusionsThese findings illustrate that CTCF and cohesin are not primary determinants of LAD patterns. Rather, these proteins locally modulate NL interactions.

Indexed as

HistonesNuclear LaminaAnimalsCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNAMiceCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsCtcf protein, mouseDNAHistonesAcute protein depletionCohesinCTCFHeterochromatinLamina-associated domainsLocal detachmentNuclear laminapA-DamID

Identifiers

PMID36050765
PMCPMC9438259
OpenAlexW4294018292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.