Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Exploratory application of machine learning methods on patient reported data in the development of supervised models for predicting outcomes.
Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting Dental Anxiety and Cooperative Behavior in Children Using Machine Learning: A Cross-Sectional Predictive Modeling Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Outpatient Primary Care: A Scoping Review on Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a Patient-Centered Outcome Tool for Blepharospasm: A Stepwise Modified Delphi Study.Toxins · 2025Article
- A narrative review of the use of PROMs and machine learning to impact value-based clinical decision-making.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Review
- Using artificial intelligence to predict patient outcomes from patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Developing a Prototype Machine Learning Model to Predict Quality of Life Measures in People Living With HIV.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are commonly used in clinical practice to support clinical decision making. However, few studies have investigated machine learning methods for predicting PROMs outcomes and thereby support clinical decision making.
objectiveThis study investigates to what extent different machine learning methods, applied to two different PROMs datasets, can predict outcomes among patients with non-specific neck and/or low back pain.
methodsUsing two datasets consisting of PROMs from (1) care-seeking low back pain patients in primary care who participated in a randomized controlled trial, and (2) patients with neck and/or low back pain referred to multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation, we present data science methods for data prepossessing and evaluate selected regression and classification methods for predicting patient outcomes.
resultsThe results show that there is a potential for machine learning to predict and classify PROMs. The prediction models based on baseline measurements perform well, and the number of predictors can be reduced, which is an advantage for implementation in decision support scenarios. The classification task shows that the dataset does not contain all necessary predictors for the care type classification. Overall, the work presents generalizable machine learning pipelines that can be adapted to other PROMs datasets.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of PROMs in predicting short-term patient outcomes. Our results indicate that machine learning methods can be used to exploit the predictive value of PROMs and thereby support clinical decision making, given that the PROMs hold enough predictive power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.