Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050718›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July-November 2021.

Jostein Starrfelt, Anders Skyrud Danielsen, Eirik Alnes Buanes, Lene Kristine Juvet, Trude Marie Lyngstad, Gunnar Øyvind Isaksson Rø, Lamprini Veneti, Sara Viksmoen Watle, Hinta Meijerink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jostein StarrfeltDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Postboks 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway. jostein.starrfelt@fhi.no.ORCID 0000-0003-3714-4844
Anders Skyrud DanielsenDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Postboks 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik Alnes BuanesNorwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR), Helse Bergen Health Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Lene Kristine JuvetDepartment of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Trude Marie LyngstadDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Postboks 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar Øyvind Isaksson RøDepartment of Development and Analytics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Lamprini VenetiDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Postboks 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Sara Viksmoen WatleDepartment of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Hinta MeijerinkDepartment of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in the pandemic response and understanding changes in vaccines effectiveness is essential to guide vaccine policies. Although the Delta variant is no longer dominant, understanding vaccine effectiveness properties will provide essential knowledge to comprehend the development of the pandemic and estimate potential changes over time.

methodsIn this population-based cohort study, we estimated the vaccine effectiveness of Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech; BNT162b2), Spikevax (Moderna; mRNA-1273), Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca; ChAdOx nCoV-19; AZD1222), or a combination against SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalisations, intensive care admissions, and death using Cox proportional hazard models, across different vaccine product regimens and age groups, between 15 July and 31 November 2021 (Delta variant period). Vaccine status is included as a time-varying covariate and all models were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, county of residence, country of birth, and living conditions. Data from the entire adult Norwegian population were collated from the National Preparedness Register for COVID-19 (Beredt C19).

resultsThe overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection decreased from 81.3% (confidence interval (CI): 80.7 to 81.9) in the first 2 to 9 weeks after receiving a second dose to 8.6% (CI: 4.0 to 13.1) after more than 33 weeks, compared to 98.6% (CI: 97.5 to 99.2) and 66.6% (CI: 57.9 to 73.6) against hospitalisation respectively. After the third dose (booster), the effectiveness was 75.9% (CI: 73.4 to 78.1) against infection and 95.0% (CI: 92.6 to 96.6) against hospitalisation. Spikevax or a combination of mRNA products provided the highest protection, but the vaccine effectiveness decreased with time since vaccination for all vaccine regimens.

conclusionsEven though the vaccine effectiveness against infection waned over time, all vaccine regimens remained effective against hospitalisation after the second vaccine dose. For all vaccine regimens, a booster facilitated recovery of effectiveness. The results from this support the use of heterologous schedules, increasing flexibility in vaccination policy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdultBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19Cohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHospitalizationHumansNorwaySARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCohort studiesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinesHospitalizationIntensive care unitsMortalityNorwayProportional hazards modelsRegistriesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36050718
PMCPMC9436448
OpenAlexW4294132437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.