Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050667›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Can cognition help predict suicide risk in patients with major depressive disorder? A machine learning study.

Shuqiong Zheng, Weixiong Zeng, Qianqian Xin, Youran Ye, Xiang Xue, Enze Li, Ting Liu, Na Yan, Weiguo Chen, Honglei Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Risky decision-making in major depressive disorder: A three-level meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuqiong Zheng *Department of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weixiong Zeng *Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qianqian XinDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Youran YeDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang XueDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Enze LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ting LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Na YanDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiguo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. chen1999@smu.edu.cn.
Honglei YinDepartment of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. yinhonglei1981@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies suggest that deficits in cognition may increase the risk of suicide. Our study aims to develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm-based suicide risk prediction model using cognition in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

methodsParticipants comprised 52 depressed suicide attempters (DSA) and 61 depressed non-suicide attempters (DNS), and 98 healthy controls (HC). All participants were required to complete a series of questionnaires, the Suicide Stroop Task (SST) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The performance in IGT was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. ML with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classification algorithm and locally explanatory techniques assessed performance and relative importance of characteristics for predicting suicide attempts. Prediction performances were compared with the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

resultsDSA and DNS preferred to select the card from disadvantageous decks (decks "A" + "B") under risky situation (p = 0.023) and showed a significantly poorer learning effect during the IGT (F = 2.331, p = 0.019) compared with HC. Performance of XGBoost model based on demographic and clinical characteristics was compared with that of the model created after adding cognition data (AUC, 0.779 vs. 0.819, p > 0.05). The net benefit of model was improved and cognition resulted in continuous reclassification improvement with NRI of 5.3%. Several clinical dimensions were significant predictors in the XGBoost classification algorithm. LIMITATIONS: A limited sample size and failure to include sufficient suicide risk factors in the predictive model.

conclusionThis study demonstrate that cognitive deficits may serve as an important risk factor to predict suicide attempts in patients with MDD. Combined with other demographic characteristics and attributes drawn from clinical questionnaires, cognitive function can improve the predictive effectiveness of the ML model. Additionally, explanatory ML models can help clinicians detect specific risk factors for each suicide attempter within MDD patients. These findings may be helpful for clinicians to detect those at high risk of suicide attempts quickly and accurately, and help them make proactive treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderCognitionDecision MakingHumansMachine LearningSuicide, AttemptedCognitionDepressionMachine learningSuicide attempt

Identifiers

PMID36050667
PMCPMC9434973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.