Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050590›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2022

Larval gut microbiome of Pelidnota luridipes (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): high bacterial diversity, different metabolic profiles on gut chambers and species with probiotic potential.

Silvia Altoé Falqueto, Janaína Rosa de Sousa, Rafael Correia da Silva, Gilvan Ferreira da Silva, Daniel Guariz Pinheiro, Marcos Antônio Soares

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. First Data on the Investigation of Gut Yeasts in Hermit Beetle (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia Altoé FalquetoLaboratório de Ecologia e Biotecnologia Microbiana, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-8872
Janaína Rosa de SousaLaboratório de Ecologia e Biotecnologia Microbiana, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Rafael Correia da SilvaDepartamento de Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Gilvan Ferreira da SilvaLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Daniel Guariz PinheiroDepartamento de Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Antônio SoaresLaboratório de Ecologia e Biotecnologia Microbiana, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil. drmasoares@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-3188
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso 0583867/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelidnota luridipes Blanchard (1850) is a tropical beetle of the family Scarabaeidae, whose larvae live on wood without parental care. Microbiota of mid- and hindgut of larvae was evaluated by culture-dependent and independent methods, and the results show a diverse microbiota, with most species of bacteria and fungi shared between midgut and hindgut. We isolated 272 bacterial and 29 yeast isolates, identified in 57 and 7 species, respectively, while using metabarcoding, we accessed 1,481 and 267 OTUs of bacteria and fungi, respectively. The composition and abundance of bacteria and fungi differed between mid- and hindgut, with a tendency for higher richness and diversity of yeasts in the midgut, and bacteria on the hindgut. Some taxa are abundant in the intestine of P. luridipes larvae, such as Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria; as well as Saccharomycetales and Trichosporonales yeasts. Mid- and hindgut metabolic profiles differ (e.g. biosynthesis of amino acids, cofactors, and lipopolysaccharides) with higher functional diversity in the hindgut. Isolates have different functional traits such as secretion of hydrolytic enzymes and antibiosis against pathogens. Apiotrichum siamense L29A and Bacillus sp. BL17B protected larvae of the moth Galleria mellonella, against infection by the pathogens Listeria monocytogenes ATCC19111 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027. This is the first work with the larval microbiome of a Rutelini beetle, demonstrating its diversity and potential in prospecting microbial products as probiotics. The functional role of microbiota for the nutrition and adaptability of P. luridipes larvae needs to be evaluated in the future.

Indexed as

ColeopteraGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsBacteriaFungiLarvaMetabolomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SGrubLytic enzymesMetabarcodingProbioticsRutelinaeSaproxylic beetles

Identifiers

PMID36050590
OpenAlexW4294147633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.