ArticleNeurocritical care2023
Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a medical challenge in the peripartum period requiring a multimodal approach: a case report.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Intracranial Pressure Estimation Using B4C Device: A Systematic Review on the Validation Studies.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation in the intensive care unit: narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- A noninvasive method for assessing optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Impact of hemodynamic management guided by intracranial compliance on the outcome of critically ill patients - preliminary results and exploratory economic evaluation.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- The clinical significance of intracranial pressure waveform analysis in brain-injured patients.Critical care science · 2026Review
- Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring using optic nerve sheath diameter and the Brain4Care system.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring-based therapy on clinical efficacy and serum levels in neurosurgical patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Exploring Cerebrospinal Compensatory Zones Using a Noninvasive Approach.Neurocritical care · 2025Observational
- Clinical Performance of the Brain4care System for Noninvasive Detection of Intracranial Hypertension.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Towards quantitative assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in human neonates using ultrafast ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Noninvasive Method Using Mechanical Extensometer for the Estimation of Intracranial Compliance by Repeated Measures Agreement Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Machine learning approach for noninvasive intracranial pressure estimation using pulsatile cranial expansion waveforms.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Evolving concepts in intracranial pressure monitoring - from traditional monitoring to precision medicine.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- An ultrasensitive multimodal intracranial pressure biotelemetric system enabled by exceptional point and iontronics.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Observational study of intracranial compliance analysis in neurologically healthy pediatric patients using a non-invasive device.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Management of shunt dysfunction using noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform monitoring: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- A Point-of-Care Noninvasive Technique for Surrogate ICP Waveforms Application in Neurocritical Care.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- A new noninvasive method can effectively assess intracranial compliance. Letter to the Editor.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- The intracranial compartmental syndrome: a proposed model for acute brain injury monitoring and management.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulse amplitude index (PAx), a descriptor of cerebrovascular reactivity, correlates the changes of the pulse amplitude of the intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform (AMP) with changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP). AMP relies on cerebrovascular compliance, which is modulated by the state of the cerebrovascular reactivity. PAx can aid in prognostication after acute brain injuries as a tool for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation and could potentially tailor individual management; however, invasive measurements are required for its calculation. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between noninvasive PAx (nPAx) derived from a novel noninvasive device for ICP monitoring and PAx derived from gold standard invasive methods.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed invasive ICP (external ventricular drain) and non-invasive ICP (nICP), via mechanical extensometer (Brain4Care Corp.). Invasive and non-invasive ICP waveform morphology data was collected in adult patients with brain injury with arterial blood pressure monitoring. The time series from all signals were first treated to remove movement artifacts. PAx and nPAx were calculated as the moving correlation coefficients of 10-s averages of AMP or non-invasive AMP (nAMP) and MAP. AMP/nAMP was determined by calculating the fundamental frequency amplitude of the ICP/nICP signal over a 10-s window, updated every 10-s. We then evaluated the relationship between invasive PAx and noninvasive nPAx using the methods of repeated-measures analysis to generate an estimate of the correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The agreement between the two methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman test.
resultsTwenty-four patients were identified. The median age was 53.5 years (interquartile range 40-70), and intracranial hemorrhage (84%) was the most common etiology. Twenty-one (87.5%) patients underwent mechanical ventilation, and 60% were sedated with a median Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 (7-15). Mean PAx was 0.0296 ± 0.331, and nPAx was 0.0171 ± 0.332. The correlation between PAx and nPAx was strong (R = 0.70, p < 0.0005, 95% CI 0.687-0.717). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement, with a bias of - 0.018 (95% CI - 0.026 to - 0.01) and a localized regression trend line that did not deviate from 0.
conclusionsPAx can be calculated by conventional and noninvasive ICP monitoring in a statistically significant evaluation with strong agreement. Further study of the applications of this clinical tool is warranted, with the goal of early therapeutic intervention to improve neurologic outcomes following acute brain injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.