ArticleScientific reports2022
A comparison of deep learning U-Net architectures for posterior segment OCT retinal layer segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- AMD-UPerNet: a tool for retinal layer and fluid assessment in age-related macular degeneration.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Dual coordinate attention (DCA) network for accurate cerebral vascular endothelium segmentation in OCT images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Tooth Segmentation in Panoramic Dental Radiographs: Balancing Accuracy and Computational Efficiency.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Performance Comparison of U-Net and Its Variants for Carotid Intima-Media Segmentation in Ultrasound Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Structural-prior guided and feature-enhanced transformer with masked image modeling pretraining for retinal layers and fluid segmentation in macular edema OCT images.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Surrogate modeling of Cellular-Potts agent-based models as a segmentation task using the U-Net neural network architecture.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted readout method for the evaluation of skin prick automated test results.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Wide-field OCT volumetric segmentation using semi-supervised CNN and transformer integration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing signal-to-noise ratio in real-time LED-based photoacoustic imaging: A comparative study of CNN-based deep learning architectures.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Comparing UNet configurations for anthropogenic geomorphic feature extraction from land surface parameters.PloS one · 2025Article
- MedSegBench: A comprehensive benchmark for medical image segmentation in diverse data modalities.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Deep learning based highly accurate transplanted bioengineered corneal equivalent thickness measurement using optical coherence tomography.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationship between 24-2 visual field and widefield optical coherence tomography data across healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma eyes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024Article
- Quantitative assessment of chlorine gas inhalation injury based on endoscopic OCT and spectral encoded interferometric microscope imaging with deep learning.APL photonics · 2024Article
- Deep multimodal saliency parcellation of cerebellar pathways: Linking microstructure and individual function through explainable multitask learning.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Quantifying Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Analysis Across 12 Deep Learning Models.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Characterisation of the normal human ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer using widefield optical coherence tomography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning methods have enabled a fast, accurate and automated approach for retinal layer segmentation in posterior segment OCT images. Due to the success of semantic segmentation methods adopting the U-Net, a wide range of variants and improvements have been developed and applied to OCT segmentation. Unfortunately, the relative performance of these methods is difficult to ascertain for OCT retinal layer segmentation due to a lack of comprehensive comparative studies, and a lack of proper matching between networks in previous comparisons, as well as the use of different OCT datasets between studies. In this paper, a detailed and unbiased comparison is performed between eight U-Net architecture variants across four different OCT datasets from a range of different populations, ocular pathologies, acquisition parameters, instruments and segmentation tasks. The U-Net architecture variants evaluated include some which have not been previously explored for OCT segmentation. Using the Dice coefficient to evaluate segmentation performance, minimal differences were noted between most of the tested architectures across the four datasets. Using an extra convolutional layer per pooling block gave a small improvement in segmentation performance for all architectures across all four datasets. This finding highlights the importance of careful architecture comparison (e.g. ensuring networks are matched using an equivalent number of layers) to obtain a true and unbiased performance assessment of fully semantic models. Overall, this study demonstrates that the vanilla U-Net is sufficient for OCT retinal layer segmentation and that state-of-the-art methods and other architectural changes are potentially unnecessary for this particular task, especially given the associated increased complexity and slower speed for the marginal performance gains observed. Given the U-Net model and its variants represent one of the most commonly applied image segmentation methods, the consistent findings across several datasets here are likely to translate to many other OCT datasets and studies. This will provide significant value by saving time and cost in experimentation and model development as well as reduced inference time in practice by selecting simpler models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.