Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Effect of a 16-week multi-level classroom standing desk intervention on cognitive performance and academic achievement in adolescents.

Danilo R Silva, Daniel G S Machado, Fernando Pinto, Pedro B Júdice, Cláudia S Minderico, Paul J Collings, Edilson S Cyrino, Luís B Sardinha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03137836 (Effects of Sit-to-stand Desks on Behavior and Cognitive Function in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03137836 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Sit-to-stand Desks on Behavior and Cognitive Function in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LisbonRan2016 to 2016Enrolled49ConditionsSedentary Lifestyle, Cognitive Ability, GeneralArmsIntervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Danilo R SilvaDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, Avenida Marechal Rondon, s/no, Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, SE, CEP 49100-000, Brazil. danilorpsilva@gmail.com.
Daniel G S MachadoResearch Group in Neuroscience of Human Movement (NeuroMove), Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Fernando PintoDepartment of Social Sciences, Eça de Queiros Secondary School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro B JúdiceCIDEFES, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cláudia S MindericoExercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Paul J CollingsBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Edilson S CyrinoMetabolism, Nutrition, and Exercise Laboratory, State University of Londrina, Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km 380, Londrina/PR, 86057-970, Brazil.
Luís B SardinhaExercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/17/37/32937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The replacement of traditional classroom desks for active-permissive desks has been tested to reduce sitting time during classes. However, their impact on other domains is still unclear. We aimed to verify the potential effects of a classroom standing desk intervention on cognitive function and academic achievement in 6th-grade students. This was a controlled trial conducted with two classes [intervention (n = 22) and control (n = 27)] from a public school in Lisbon, Portugal. The intervention was carried out for 16 weeks and consisted of multi-level actions (students, parents, and teachers) centered on the implementation of standing desks in the intervention classroom. The control group had traditional classes with no use of standing desks or any other interference/action from the research team. Pre- and post-assessments of executive functions (attention, inhibitory function, memory, and fluid intelligence) and academic achievement were obtained. No differences between groups were found at baseline. Both groups improved (time effect) academic achievement (p < 0.001), memory span (p < 0.001), and inhibitory function (p = 0.008). Group versus time interactions were observed regarding operational memory (intervention: + 18.0% and control: + 41.6%; p = 0.039) and non-verbal fluid intelligence (intervention: - 14.0% and control: + 3.9%; p = 0.017). We concluded that a 16-week classroom standing desk intervention did not improve cognitive performance or academic achievement more than the traditional sitting classes.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT03137836) (date of first registration: 03/05/2017).

Indexed as

Academic SuccessSedentary BehaviorAdolescentCognitionHumansSchoolsSitting PositionStanding Position

Identifiers

PMID36050353
PMCPMC9437021
OpenAlexW4294086110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.