Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050340›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Detection of human pathogenic bacteria in rectal DNA samples from Zalophus californianus in the Gulf of California, Mexico.

Francesco Cicala, David Ramírez-Delgado, Ricardo Gómez-Reyes, Marcel Martínez-Porchas, Jorge Rojas-Vargas, Liliana Pardo-López, Alexei F Licea-Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco CicalaDepartment of Biomedical Innovation, Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-4310
David Ramírez-DelgadoDepartment of Marine Ecology, Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-6850
Ricardo Gómez-ReyesOceanology Research Institute. Autonomous University of Baja California, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.
Marcel Martínez-PorchasLaboratory of Experimental Biology, Center for Research in Food and Development, A.C., Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-6731
Jorge Rojas-VargasDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Biotechnology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Liliana Pardo-LópezDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Biotechnology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8927-1733
Alexei F Licea-NavarroDepartment of Biomedical Innovation, Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. alicea@cicese.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-7405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human intrusions into undisturbed wildlife areas greatly contribute to the emergence of infectious diseases. To minimize the impacts of novel emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) on human health, a comprehensive understanding of the microbial species that reside within wildlife species is required. The Gulf of California (GoC) is an example of an undisturbed ecosystem. However, in recent decades, anthropogenic activities within the GoC have increased. Zalophus californianus has been proposed as the main sentinel species in the GoC; hence, an assessment of sea lion bacterial microbiota may reveal hidden risks for human health. We evaluated the presence of potential human pathogenic bacterial species from the gastrointestinal (GI) tracts of wild sea lions through a metabarcoding approach. To comprehensively evaluate this bacterial consortium, we considered the genetic information of six hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA. Potential human pathogenic bacteria were identified down to the species level by integrating the RDP and Pplacer classifier outputs. The combined genetic information from all analyzed regions suggests the presence of at least 44 human pathogenic bacterial species, including Shigella dysenteriae and Bacillus anthracis. Therefore, the risks of EIDs from this area should be not underestimated.

Indexed as

Sea LionsAnimalsBacteriaDNAEcosystemHumansMexicoRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36050340
PMCPMC9434536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.