Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36050149›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022

Auditory grouping is necessary to understand interrupted mosaic speech stimuli.

Kazuo Ueda, Hiroshige Takeichi, Kohei Wakamiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazuo UedaDepartment of Human Science, Faculty of Design/Research Center for Applied Perceptual Science/Research and Development Center for Five-Sense Devices, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1885-0463
Hiroshige TakeichiOpen Systems Information Science Team, Advanced Data Science Project (ADSP), RIKEN Information Research and Development and Strategy Headquarters (R-IH), RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8545-417X
Kohei WakamiyaDepartment of Communication Design Science, Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8540, Japan.

Funding

Determinants of phonetic category structure in language impairmentR21DC016141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI THEODORE, RACHEL MARIE · 2017 to 2019
$464k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intelligibility of interrupted speech stimuli has been known to be almost perfect when segment duration is shorter than 80 ms, which means that the interrupted segments are perceptually organized into a coherent stream under this condition. However, why listeners can successfully group the interrupted segments into a coherent stream has been largely unknown. Here, we show that the intelligibility for mosaic speech in which original speech was segmented in frequency and time and noise-vocoded with the average power in each unit was largely reduced by periodical interruption. At the same time, the intelligibility could be recovered by promoting auditory grouping of the interrupted segments by stretching the segments up to 40 ms and reducing the gaps, provided that the number of frequency bands was enough ( ≥ 4) and the original segment duration was equal to or less than 40 ms. The interruption was devastating for mosaic speech stimuli, very likely because the deprivation of periodicity and temporal fine structure with mosaicking prevented successful auditory grouping for the interrupted segments.

Indexed as

Speech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationNoise

Identifiers

PMID36050149
PMCPMC9553289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.