Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36049595›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography2022

An Automated View Classification Model for Pediatric Echocardiography Using Artificial Intelligence.

Addison Gearhart, Shinichi Goto, Rahul C Deo, Andrew J Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis of Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Addison GearhartDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: addison.gearhart@cardio.chboston.org.
Shinichi GotoOne Brave Idea, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rahul C DeoOne Brave Idea, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew J PowellDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

RESEARCH METHODS IN PEDIATRICS HEART DISEASET32HL007572 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Sarah D DE FERRANTI, Jane W. Newburger · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
Machine learning for the automated identification and tracking of rare myocardial diseasesR01HL140731 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MACRAE, CALUM A., SHAH, SANJIV J · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140731NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundView classification is a key step toward building a fully automated system for interpretation of echocardiograms. However, compared with adult echocardiograms, creating a view classification model for pediatric echocardiograms poses additional challenges, such as greater variation in anatomy, structure size, and views. The aim of this study was to develop a computer vision model to autonomously perform view classification on pediatric echocardiographic images.

methodsUsing a training set of 12,067 echocardiographic images from patients aged 0 to 19 years, a convolutional neural network model was trained to identify 27 preselected standard pediatric echocardiographic views which included anatomic sweeps, color Doppler, and Doppler tracings. A validation set of 6,197 images was used for parameter tuning and model selection. A test set of 9,684 images from 100 different patients was then used to evaluate model accuracy. The model was also evaluated on a per study basis using a second test set consisting of 524 echocardiograms from children with leukemia to identify six preselected views pertinent to cardiac dysfunction surveillance.

resultsThe model identified the 27 preselected views with 90.3% accuracy. Accuracy was similar across age groups (89.3% for 0-4 years, 90.8% for 4-9 years, 90.0% for 9-14 years, and 91.2% for 14-19 years; P = .12). Examining the view subtypes, accuracy was 78.3% for the cine one location, 90.5% for sweeps with color Doppler, 82.2% for sweeps without color Doppler, and 91.1% for Doppler tracings. Among the leukemia cohort, the model identified the six preselected views on a per study basis with a positive predictive value of 98.7% to 99.2% and sensitivity of 76.9% to 94.8%.

conclusionsA convolutional neural network model was constructed for view classification of pediatric echocardiograms that was accurate across the spectrum of ages and view types. This work lays the foundation for automated quantitative analysis and diagnostic support to promote efficient, accurate, and scalable analysis of pediatric echocardiograms.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLeukemiaChildComputer SimulationEchocardiographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkEchocardiographyPediatric cardiologyView classification

Identifiers

PMID36049595
PMCPMC9990955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.