Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048822›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its associated factors in Malaysia.

Kai Wei Lee, Lai Ti Gew, Ching Sin Siau, Suat Cheng Peh, Yook Chin Chia, Shakila Yacob, Nee Nee Chan, Vei Ken Seow, Pei Boon Ooi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kai Wei LeeFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pre-Clinical Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9737-8066
Lai Ti GewDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Ching Sin SiauFaculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Suat Cheng PehJeffrey Sachs Center on Sustainable Development, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Yook Chin ChiaDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-0359
Shakila YacobFaculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Department of History, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nee Nee ChanFaculty of Social Sciences, UCSI University Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Vei Ken SeowEmergency Medicine Department, Sunway Medical Centre, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Pei Boon OoiDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-3381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of the COVID-19 vaccination programme to achieve herd immunity depends on the proportion of the population inoculated. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is a barrier to reaching a sufficient number of people to achieve herd immunity. This study aims to determine the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and to identify the reasons contributing to vaccine hesitancy using the Theory of Planned Behavior. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between May 2021 to June 2021. Using exponential non-discriminative snowball sampling, participants were recruited via social media and telecommunication platforms. We used a questionnaire that obtained information on participant socio-demographics, vaccine hesitancy, pseudoscientific practices, conspiracy beliefs, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, main reasons for not intending to get the COVID-19 vaccine; influential leaders, gatekeepers and anti-or pro-vaccination lobbies; and global vaccine hesitancy. A total of 354 responses (mean age = 32.5 years old ±13.6; 70.3% females) were included for analysis. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was 11.6%. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was significantly and positively associated with those who agreed with influential leaders, gatekeepers, and anti- or pro-vaccination lobbies (adjusted B coefficient = 1.355, p = 0.014), having a "wait and see" attitude to see if the COVID-19 vaccine is safe (adjusted B coefficient = 0. 822, p <0.001), perceiving that the vaccine will give them COVID-19 (adjusted B coefficient = 0.660, p <0.002), planned to use masks/others precautions instead (adjusted B coefficient = 0.345, p = 0.038) and having higher scores in conspiracy beliefs (adjusted B coefficient = 0.128, p <0.001). Concern about the costs associated with the vaccine (adjusted B coefficient = -0.518, p <0.001), subjective norms (adjusted B coefficient = -0.341, p <0.001), and perceived behavioural control (adjusted B coefficient = -0.202, p = 0.004) were negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia is low. Several factors were identified as being associated with vaccine hesitancy. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy would be useful in tailoring specific interventions involving positive messages by influential leaders, which address vaccine misinformation and the wait-and-see attitude which may delay the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalaysiaMaleParentsVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36048822
PMCPMC9436036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.