ArticlePloS one2022
Inclusion of children with disabilities in qualitative health research: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Child participation and care experience in child health clinic nursing encounters: children's views by multi-methodology.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Article
- 'I Do Often Feel Like We Were Given a Magic Wand' - Children's and Families' Experiences of Allied Health Services for Developmental and Disability Needs in Rural and/or Remote South Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Participation of children with obstructive sleep apnea in clinical trials: a systematic review of barriers and interventions.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Disparities in deworming coverage between children with and without disabilities: insights from the DeWorm3 trial in India.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Perceptions of the national school holiday programme (Holiday Activities and Food) in England as experienced by local government, service providers and users of the service: a mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Integrated Knowledge Translation for Social Innovations: Case Study on Knowledge Translation Innovation Incubator.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding school-based rehabilitation services through the lived experiences of children and youth with disabilities: a meta-aggregative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Community health assets and refugee wellbeing: Qualitative evidence across mental health, disability inclusion, end-of-life care, and women's health - A global scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Uncovering systemic barriers related to equity, diversity and inclusion in child health research: a scoping review addressing marginalised communities.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Involving people with lived experience when setting cerebral palsy research priorities: A scoping review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Are school-based violence prevention interventions inclusive and effective for children with disabilities? A systematic review of global evidence.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Navigating racism, stigma, and autism services: A scoping review of the lived experiences of racially and ethnically minoritized families.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Disability Inclusive Youth (DIY) Research: an innovative and co-creative study to improve inclusion of children and youth with disabilities in health research in East Africa: a mixed-method study protocol.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
- Singing for health: a participatory process to design a song-based intervention for hypertension.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Protocol for an undergraduate student-led scoping review of methods used to conduct inclusive focus groups with autistic adolescents.PloS one · 2025Article
- Co-creating Inclusive and Non-ableist Public Health Policies With Persons With Disabilities Comment on "How Did Governments Address the Needs of People With Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic? An Analysis of 14 Countries' Policies Based on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities".International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review.EJC paediatric oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- What supports and services post COVID-19 do children with disabilities and their parents need and want, now and into the future?Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with disabilities have the right to participate in health research so their priorities, needs, and experiences are included. Health research based primarily on adult report risks misrepresenting children with disabilities and their needs, and contributes to exclusion and a lack of diversity in the experiences being captured. Prioritizing the participation of children with disabilities enhances the relevance, meaningfulness, and impact of research.
methodsA scoping review was conducted to critically examine the participation of children with disabilities in qualitative health research. The electronic databases PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched. Inclusion criteria included qualitative health studies conducted with children with disabilities, published between 2007 and 2020, and written in English. Articles were screened by two reviewers and the synthesis of data was performed using numeric and content analysis.
resultsA total of 62 studies met inclusion criteria. Rationales for including children with disabilities included child-focused, medical model of disability, and disability rights rationales. Participation of children with disabilities in qualitative health research was limited, with the majority of studies conducting research on rather than in partnership with or by children. Findings emphasize that children with disabilities are not participating in the design and implementation of health research.
conclusionFurther effort should be made by health researchers to incorporate children with a broad range of impairments drawing on theory and methodology from disability and childhood studies and collaborating with people who have expertise in these areas. Furthermore, an array of multi-method inclusive, accessible, adaptable, and non-ableist methods should be available to enable different ways of expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.