Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048773›Full record

ArticleNano letters2022

Controlling Nanoparticle Uptake in Innate Immune Cells with Heparosan Polysaccharides.

Wen Yang, Alex N Frickenstein, Vinit Sheth, Alyssa Holden, Evan M Mettenbrink, Lin Wang, Alexis A Woodward, Bryan S Joo, Sarah K Butterfield, Nathan D Donahue and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Wen YangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Alex N FrickensteinStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Vinit ShethStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Alyssa HoldenStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Evan M MettenbrinkStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Lin WangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-8225
Alexis A WoodwardStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Bryan S JooStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Sarah K ButterfieldStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Nathan D DonahueStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Dixy E GreenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma73104, United States.
Abigail G ThomasStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Tekena HarcourtStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Hamilton YoungStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-5780
Mulan TangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Zain A MalikStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Roger G HarrisonSchool of Chemical, Biological and Materials Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2401-627X
Priyabrata MukherjeeDepartment of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma73104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-0833
Paul L DeAngelisDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma73104, United States.
Stefan WilhelmStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2167-6221

Funding

Use of 3D Quantitative Optical Methods to Optimize Mebendazole Treatment of Ovarian CancerP20GM135009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI Yuye Ling · 2022 to 2026
$13.6M
Molecular Mechanism of Antiangiogenic Properties of Gold NanoparticleR01CA136494 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MUKHERJEE, PRIYABRATA · 2009 to 2020
$2.9M
Reprogramming Tumor Microenvironment by NanoparticleR01CA213278 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MUKHERJEE, PRIYABRATA · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Exploiting gold nanoparticle as a probe to identify therapeutic targetsR01CA260449 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Resham Bhattacharya, Priyabrata Mukherjee · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136494NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213278NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260449NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM135009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used heparosan (HEP) polysaccharides for controlling nanoparticle delivery to innate immune cells. Our results show that HEP-coated nanoparticles were endocytosed in a time-dependent manner by innate immune cells via both clathrin-mediated and macropinocytosis pathways. Upon endocytosis, we observed HEP-coated nanoparticles in intracellular vesicles and the cytoplasm, demonstrating the potential for nanoparticle escape from intracellular vesicles. Competition with other glycosaminoglycan types inhibited the endocytosis of HEP-coated nanoparticles only partially. We further found that nanoparticle uptake into innate immune cells can be controlled by more than 3 orders of magnitude via systematically varying the HEP surface density. Our results suggest a substantial potential for HEP-coated nanoparticles to target innate immune cells for efficient intracellular delivery, including into the cytoplasm. This HEP nanoparticle surface engineering technology may be broadly used to develop efficient nanoscale devices for drug and gene delivery as well as possibly for gene editing and immuno-engineering applications.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesClathrinDisaccharidesEndocytosisImmunity, InnatePolysaccharidesClathrinDisaccharidesheparosanPolysaccharidesantigen-presenting cellsendocytosisHeparosanimmuno-engineeringnanoparticlessurface modification

Identifiers

PMID36048773
PMCPMC9486251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.