Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048752›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022

Benchmarking One-Phase Lipid Extractions for Plasma Lipidomics.

Marcus Höring, Christoph Stieglmeier, Katja Schnabel, Tucker Hallmark, Kim Ekroos, Ralph Burkhardt, Gerhard Liebisch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical lipidomics in bacterial sepsis: a systematic review of serum and plasma evaluations.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent Analytical Methodologies in Lipid Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus HöringInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg University Hospital, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3651-392X
Christoph StieglmeierInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg University Hospital, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-9623
Katja SchnabelInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg University Hospital, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Tucker HallmarkAvanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, Alabama 35007, United States.
Kim EkroosLipidomics Consulting Ltd., 02230 Esbo, Finland.
Ralph BurkhardtInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg University Hospital, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Gerhard LiebischInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg University Hospital, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4886-0811
University Hospital Regensburg · DEAvanti Polar Lipids (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key element of successful lipidomics analysis is a sufficient extraction of lipid molecules typically by two-phase systems such as chloroform-based Bligh and Dyer (B&D). However, numerous metabolomics and lipidomics studies today apply easy to use one-phase extractions. In this work, quantitative flow injection analysis high-resolution mass spectrometry was applied to benchmark the lipid recovery of popular one-phase extraction methods for human plasma samples. The following organic solvents were investigated: methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), 2-propanol (IPA), 1-butanol (BuOH), acetonitrile (ACN) and the solvent mixtures BuOH/MeOH (3:1) and MeOH/ACN (1:1). The recovery of polar lysophospholipids was sufficient for all tested solvents. However, nonpolar lipid classes such as triglycerides (TG) and cholesteryl esters (CE) revealed extraction efficiencies less than 5% due to precipitation in polar solvents EtOH, MeOH, MeOH/ACN, and ACN. Sample pellets also contained a substantial amount of phospholipids, for example, more than 75% of total phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin for ACN. The loss of lipids by precipitation was directly related to the polarity of solvents and lipid classes. Although, lipid recovery increased with the volume of organic solvent, recovery in polar MeOH remains incomplete also for less polar lipid classes such as ceramides. Addition of stable isotope-labeled internal standards prior to lipid extraction could compensate for insufficient lipid recovery for polar lipid classes including lysolipids and phospholipids but not for nonpolar CE and TG. In summary, application of one-phase extractions should be limited to polar lipid classes unless sufficient recovery/solubility of nonpolar lipids has been demonstrated. The presented data reveal that appropriate lipid extraction efficiency is fundamental to achieve accurate lipid quantification.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingLipidomicsHumansMass SpectrometryMethanolPhospholipidsSolventsTriglyceridesMethanolPhospholipidsSolventsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID36048752
PMCPMC9475500
OpenAlexW4294043675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.