Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048571›Full record

ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2022

[Returning to work after diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer].

Natalia Camejo-Martínez, Cecilia Castillo-Leska, Ana Laura Hernández-Ibero, Nora Amelia Artagaveytia-Cóppola, Dahiana Lourdes Amarillo-Hernández, Gabriel David Krygier-Waltier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalia Camejo-MartínezUniversidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Servicio de Oncología. Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-8684-0291
Cecilia Castillo-LeskaUniversidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Servicio de Oncología. Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-0417-0512
Ana Laura Hernández-IberoUniversidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento de Psicologia Médica. Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-7335-9530
Nora Amelia Artagaveytia-CóppolaUniversidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento Básico de Medicina. Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-8798-7941
Dahiana Lourdes Amarillo-HernándezUniversidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Servicio de Oncología. Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-8639
Gabriel David Krygier-WaltierUniversidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Servicio de Oncología. Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-0518-1854
Universidad de la República · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Returning to work and performing housework tasks (HWT) is the final step in overcoming breast cancer (BC). Objective: To assess whether clinical characteristics and type of treatment impact employment status and performance of HWT. Material and methods: A total of 119 patients diagnosed with early BC were enrolled. Occupational and HWT-related variables were measured. Results: At diagnosis, most of the patients were employed and performed HWT. Two years after the end of treatment, 50% of the patients who were working continued to work and 68.6% of these had issues returning to work. Patients who did not return to work were diagnosed at more advanced stages and had more postoperative complications (p < 0.005). Regarding the execution of HWT, 83.3% had some degree of difficulty to perform them. Patients who underwent axillary nodal removal, those who received more frequent psychological support, and those who had more postoperative complications performed HWT with greater difficulty (p < 0.005). Conclusions: Once treatment had finished, 50% of patients did not come back to their work. In this case, the stage negative effect and the postoperative complications materialized. These data reveal that returning to work after BC diagnosis and treatment is complicated.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEmploymentFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSurvivorsBreast NeoplasmsHouseworkReturn to WorkSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID36048571
PMCPMC10395965
OpenAlexW4294124902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.