Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048543›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Antibiotic Indications and Appropriateness in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A 10-Center Point Prevalence Study.

Kathleen Chiotos, Jennifer Blumenthal, Juri Boguniewicz, Debra L Palazzi, Erika L Stalets, Jessica H Rubens, Pranita D Tamma, Stephanie S Cabler, Jason Newland, Hillary Crandall and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Establishing a paediatric critical care core quality measure set using a multistakeholder, consensus-driven process.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen ChiotosDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer BlumenthalDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Juri BoguniewiczSection of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Debra L PalazziInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Erika L StaletsDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Jessica H RubensDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pranita D TammaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stephanie S CablerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jason NewlandDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Hillary CrandallDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Emily BerkmanDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Robert P KavanaghDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hannah R StinsonDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey S GerberDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBoston Children's Hospital · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPrimary Children's Hospital · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Research Training in Pediatric Infectious DiseasesT32AI052071 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AARON M MILSTONE · 2002 to 2026
$5.2M
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality K12-HS026393AHRQ HHS K12 HS026393NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052071NIH HHS T32AI052071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are prescribed to most pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, but data describing indications and appropriateness of antibiotic orders in this population are lacking.

methodsWe performed a multicenter point prevalence study that included children admitted to 10 geographically diverse PICUs over 4 study days in 2019. Antibiotic orders were reviewed for indication, and appropriateness was assessed using a standardized rubric.

resultsOf 1462 patients admitted to participating PICUs, 843 (58%) had at least 1 antibiotic order. A total of 1277 antibiotic orders were reviewed. Common indications were empiric therapy for suspected bacterial infections without sepsis or septic shock (260 orders, 21%), nonoperative prophylaxis (164 orders, 13%), empiric therapy for sepsis or septic shock (155 orders, 12%), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP; 118 orders, 9%), and post-operative prophylaxis (94 orders, 8%). Appropriateness was assessed for 985 orders for which an evidence-based rubric for appropriateness could be created. Of these, 331 (34%) were classified as inappropriate. Indications with the most orders classified as inappropriate were empiric therapy for suspected bacterial infection without sepsis or septic shock (78 orders, 24%), sepsis or septic shock (55 orders, 17%), CAP (51 orders, 15%), ventilator-associated infections (47 orders, 14%), and post-operative prophylaxis (44 orders, 14%). The proportion of antibiotics classified as inappropriate varied across institutions (range, 19%-43%).

conclusionsMost PICU patients receive antibiotics. Based on our study, we estimate that one-third of antibiotic orders are inappropriate. Improved antibiotic stewardship and research focused on strategies to optimize antibiotic use in critically ill children are needed.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsSepsisShock, SepticAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticantimicrobial stewardshippediatric intensive care unitsepsis

Identifiers

PMID36048543
PMCPMC10169439
OpenAlexW4294000758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.