Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048518›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Developing Clinical Artificial Intelligence for Obstetric Ultrasound to Improve Access in Underserved Regions: Protocol for a Computer-Assisted Low-Cost Point-of-Care UltraSound (CALOPUS) Study.

Alice Self, Qingchao Chen, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Sumeet Dhariwal, Alexander D Gleed, Divyanshu Mishra, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Varun Chandramohan, Rachel Craik, Elizabeth Wilden and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Task-shifting from healthcare staff to patients is necessary for the future.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice SelfNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-9916
Qingchao ChenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-5609
Bapu Koundinya DesirajuTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-5364
Sumeet DhariwalInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5757-7757
Alexander D GleedInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-075X
Divyanshu MishraTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-8739
Ramachandran ThiruvengadamTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9195-2730
Varun ChandramohanTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5810-0176
Rachel CraikNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7885-0775
Elizabeth WildenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0415-7649
Ashok KhuranaThe Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-377X
CALOPUS Study Group *See Acknowledgments, .
Shinjini Bhatnagar *Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-5296
Aris T Papageorghiou *Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-2232
J Alison Noble *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-3772
University of Oxford · GBTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends a package of pregnancy care that includes obstetric ultrasound scans. There are significant barriers to universal access to antenatal ultrasound, particularly because of the cost and need for maintenance of ultrasound equipment and a lack of trained personnel. As low-cost, handheld ultrasound devices have become widely available, the current roadblock is the global shortage of health care providers trained in obstetric scanning.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to improve pregnancy and risk assessment for women in underserved regions. Therefore, we are undertaking the Computer-Assisted Low-Cost Point-of-Care UltraSound (CALOPUS) project, bringing together experts in machine learning and clinical obstetric ultrasound.

methodsIn this prospective study conducted in two clinical centers (United Kingdom and India), participating pregnant women were scanned and full-length ultrasounds were performed. Each woman underwent 2 consecutive ultrasound scans. The first was a series of simple, standardized ultrasound sweeps (the CALOPUS protocol), immediately followed by a routine, full clinical ultrasound examination that served as the comparator. We describe the development of a simple-to-use clinical protocol designed for nonexpert users to assess fetal viability, detect the presence of multiple pregnancies, evaluate placental location, assess amniotic fluid volume, determine fetal presentation, and perform basic fetal biometry. The CALOPUS protocol was designed using the smallest number of steps to minimize redundant information, while maximizing diagnostic information. Here, we describe how ultrasound videos and annotations are captured for machine learning.

resultsOver 5571 scans have been acquired, from which 1,541,751 label annotations have been performed. An adapted protocol, including a low pelvic brim sweep and a well-filled maternal bladder, improved visualization of the cervix from 28% to 91% and classification of placental location from 82% to 94%. Excellent levels of intra- and interannotator agreement are achievable following training and standardization.

conclusionsThe CALOPUS study is a unique study that uses obstetric ultrasound videos and annotations from pregnancies dated from 11 weeks and followed up until birth using novel ultrasound and annotation protocols. The data from this study are being used to develop and test several different machine learning algorithms to address key clinical diagnostic questions pertaining to obstetric risk management. We also highlight some of the challenges and potential solutions to interdisciplinary multinational imaging collaboration. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/37374.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedata annotationmachine learningobstetricsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36048518
PMCPMC9478819
OpenAlexW4294025369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.