ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2022
Evaluation of Generative Adversarial Networks for High-Resolution Synthetic Image Generation of Circumpapillary Optical Coherence Tomography Images for Glaucoma.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ophthalmic Image Synthesis and Analysis with Generative Adversarial Network Artificial Intelligence.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- In-depth analysis of research hotspots and emerging trends in AI for retinal diseases over the past decade.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Second Harmonic Generation Image Feature Tuning with Generative Models and SeFa Semantic Analysis.JPhys photonics · 2026Article
- Deep learning detection of retinitis pigmentosa inheritance forms through synthetic data expansion of a rare disease dataset.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SYN-OCT:A synthetic dataset of ocular optical coherence tomography images from healthy and glaucoma eyes.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Global research status in the treatment of glaucoma: a systematic bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Detection of Retinitis Pigmentosa Inheritance Forms through Synthetic Data Expansion of a Rare Disease Dataset.Research square · 2025Article
- Applications of generative adversarial networks in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of ophthalmic diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Realistic fundus photograph generation for improving automated disease classification.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A scoping review on generative AI and large language models in mitigating medication related harm.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Complex conjugate removal in optical coherence tomography using phase aware generative adversarial network.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Synthetic Data Generation via Generative Adversarial Networks in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Image- and Signal-Based Studies.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Assessing the Efficacy of Synthetic Optic Disc Images for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Optical coherence tomography choroidal enhancement using generative deep learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Utility of Breast Ultrasound Images Synthesized by a Generative Adversarial Network.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Computational methods in glaucoma research: Current status and future outlook.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2023Review
- Predicting glaucoma progression using deep learning framework guided by generative algorithm.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep learning in optical coherence tomography: Where are the gaps?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Deep learning (DL) networks require large data sets for training, which can be challenging to collect clinically. Generative models could be used to generate large numbers of synthetic optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to train such DL networks for glaucoma detection. Objective: To assess whether generative models can synthesize circumpapillary optic nerve head OCT images of normal and glaucomatous eyes and determine the usability of synthetic images for training DL models for glaucoma detection. Design, Setting, and Participants: Progressively growing generative adversarial network models were trained to generate circumpapillary OCT scans. Image gradeability and authenticity were evaluated on a clinical set of 100 real and 100 synthetic images by 2 clinical experts. DL networks for glaucoma detection were trained with real or synthetic images and evaluated on independent internal and external test data sets of 140 and 300 real images, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Evaluations of the clinical set between the experts were compared. Glaucoma detection performance of the DL networks was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Class activation maps provided visualizations of the regions contributing to the respective classifications. Results: A total of 990 normal and 862 glaucomatous eyes were analyzed. Evaluations of the clinical set were similar for gradeability (expert 1: 92.0%; expert 2: 93.0%) and authenticity (expert 1: 51.8%; expert 2: 51.3%). The best-performing DL network trained on synthetic images had AUC scores of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) on the internal test data set and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.93) on the external test data set, compared with AUCs of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) on the internal test data set and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87) on the external test data set for the network trained with real images. An increase in the AUC for the synthetic DL network was observed with the use of larger synthetic data set sizes. Class activation maps showed that the regions of the synthetic images contributing to glaucoma detection were generally similar to that of real images. Conclusions and Relevance: DL networks trained with synthetic OCT images for glaucoma detection were comparable with networks trained with real images. These results suggest potential use of generative models in the training of DL networks and as a means of data sharing across institutions without patient information confidentiality issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.