Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048435›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2022

Evaluation of Generative Adversarial Networks for High-Resolution Synthetic Image Generation of Circumpapillary Optical Coherence Tomography Images for Glaucoma.

Ashish Jith Sreejith Kumar, Rachel S Chong, Jonathan G Crowston, Jacqueline Chua, Inna Bujor, Rahat Husain, Eranga N Vithana, Michaël J A Girard, Daniel S W Ting, Ching-Yu Cheng and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applications of generative adversarial networks in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of ophthalmic diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial Intelligence for Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Deep learning in optical coherence tomography: Where are the gaps?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  20. Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ashish Jith Sreejith KumarSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Rachel S ChongAcademic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Jonathan G CrowstonSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Jacqueline ChuaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Inna BujorCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Rahat HusainSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Eranga N VithanaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Michaël J A GirardSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Daniel S W TingSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Ching-Yu ChengSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Tin AungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Alina Popa-CherecheanuCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Damon WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Deep learning (DL) networks require large data sets for training, which can be challenging to collect clinically. Generative models could be used to generate large numbers of synthetic optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to train such DL networks for glaucoma detection. Objective: To assess whether generative models can synthesize circumpapillary optic nerve head OCT images of normal and glaucomatous eyes and determine the usability of synthetic images for training DL models for glaucoma detection. Design, Setting, and Participants: Progressively growing generative adversarial network models were trained to generate circumpapillary OCT scans. Image gradeability and authenticity were evaluated on a clinical set of 100 real and 100 synthetic images by 2 clinical experts. DL networks for glaucoma detection were trained with real or synthetic images and evaluated on independent internal and external test data sets of 140 and 300 real images, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Evaluations of the clinical set between the experts were compared. Glaucoma detection performance of the DL networks was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Class activation maps provided visualizations of the regions contributing to the respective classifications. Results: A total of 990 normal and 862 glaucomatous eyes were analyzed. Evaluations of the clinical set were similar for gradeability (expert 1: 92.0%; expert 2: 93.0%) and authenticity (expert 1: 51.8%; expert 2: 51.3%). The best-performing DL network trained on synthetic images had AUC scores of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) on the internal test data set and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.93) on the external test data set, compared with AUCs of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) on the internal test data set and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87) on the external test data set for the network trained with real images. An increase in the AUC for the synthetic DL network was observed with the use of larger synthetic data set sizes. Class activation maps showed that the regions of the synthetic images contributing to glaucoma detection were generally similar to that of real images. Conclusions and Relevance: DL networks trained with synthetic OCT images for glaucoma detection were comparable with networks trained with real images. These results suggest potential use of generative models in the training of DL networks and as a means of data sharing across institutions without patient information confidentiality issues.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaOptic DiskHumansTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID36048435
PMCPMC9437828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.