Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048351›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2023

How is atrial fibrillation detected in everyday healthcare? Results of a Dutch cohort study.

N Verbiest-van Gurp, S B Uittenbogaart, S C M van de Moosdijk, U F van Sprang, J A Knottnerus, H E J H Stoffers, W A M Lucassen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Screening and detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care: current practice and future perspectives.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N Verbiest-van GurpDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. nicole.vangurp@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
S B UittenbogaartDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S C M van de MoosdijkDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
U F van SprangDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J A KnottnerusDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
H E J H StoffersDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
W A M LucassenDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

ZonMw 839110006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia with serious potential consequences when left untreated. For timely treatment, early detection is imperative. We explored how new AF is detected in patients aged ≥ 65 years in Dutch healthcare.

methodsThe study cohort consisted of 9526 patients from 49 Dutch general practices in the usual-care arm of the Detecting and Diagnosing Atrial Fibrillation study. We automatically extracted data from the electronic medical records and reviewed individual records of patients who developed AF. Patient selection started in 2015, and data collection ended in 2019.

resultsWe included 258 patients with newly diagnosed AF. In 55.0% of the patients, the irregular heartbeat was first observed in general practice and in 16.3% in the cardiology department. Cardiologists diagnosed most cases (47.3%), followed by general practitioners (GPs; 33.7%). AF detection was triggered by symptoms in 64.7% of the patients and by previous stroke in 3.5%. Overall, patients aged 65-74 years more often presented with symptoms than those aged ≥ 75 years (73.5% vs 60.6%; p = 0.042). In 31.5% of the patients, AF was diagnosed incidentally ('silent AF'). Silent-AF patients were on average 2 years older than symptomatic-AF patients. GPs less often diagnosed silent AF than symptomatic AF (21.0% vs 39.0%; p = 0.008), whereas physicians other than GPs or cardiologists more often diagnosed symptomatic AF than silent AF (34.6% vs 11.9%; p < 0.001). Most diagnoses were based on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (93.8%).

conclusionDiagnosing AF is a multidisciplinary process. The irregular heartbeat was most often detected by the GP, but cardiologists diagnosed most cases. One-third of all newly diagnosed AF was silent.

Indexed as

AgedAtrial fibrillationCardiologyDiagnosisElectrocardiographyGeneral practice

Identifiers

PMID36048351
PMCPMC9892390
OpenAlexW4294084791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.