Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048295›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2023

Neurocognitive deficits in depression: a systematic review of cognitive impairment in the acute and remitted state.

Dominik Kriesche, Christian F J Woll, Nadja Tschentscher, Rolf R Engel, Susanne Karch

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Cognitive Function in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominik KriescheDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Hospital of the University of Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Christian F J WollDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Clinical Psychology of Children and Adolescents, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany. christian.woll@psy.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-4796
Nadja TschentscherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Hospital of the University of Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Rolf R EngelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Hospital of the University of Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Susanne KarchDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Hospital of the University of Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research suggests a broad range of deficits in major depressive disorder. Our goal was to update the current assumptions and investigate the extent of cognitive impairment in depression in the acute and remitted state. A systematic review of the existing literature between 2009 and 2019 assessing the risk of bias within the included studies was performed. Of the 42 articles reviewed, an unclear risk of bias was shown overall. The risk of bias mainly concerned the sample selection, inadequate remedial measures, as well as the lack of blinding the assessors. In the acute phase, we found strong support for impairment in processing speed, learning, and memory. Follow-up studies and direct comparisons revealed less pronounced deficits in remission, however, deficits were still present in attention, learning and memory, and working memory. A positive correlation between the number of episodes and cognitive deficits as well as depression severity and cognitive deficits was reported. The results also demonstrate a resemblance between the cognitive profiles in bipolar disorder and depression. Comparisons of depression with schizophrenia led to unclear results, at times suggesting an overlap in cognitive performance. The main findings support the global deficit hypothesis and align with results from prior meta-analyses and reviews. Recommendations for future research are also presented.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionMajor Depressive DisorderCognitionDepressionHumansNeuropsychological TestsCognitionDeficitsDepressionImpairmentNeuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID36048295
PMCPMC10359405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.