Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048263›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2022

Comparison of total intravenous with inhalational anesthesia in terms of postoperative delirium and complications in older patients: a nationwide population-based study.

Manabu Yoshimura, Hiroko Shiramoto, Yasuhiro Morimoto, Mami Koga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manabu YoshimuraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, 750 Nishikiwa, Ube-city, Yamaguchi, 755-0151, Japan. manabu-ygc@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-5084
Hiroko ShiramotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, 750 Nishikiwa, Ube-city, Yamaguchi, 755-0151, Japan.
Yasuhiro MorimotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, 750 Nishikiwa, Ube-city, Yamaguchi, 755-0151, Japan.
Mami KogaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, 750 Nishikiwa, Ube-city, Yamaguchi, 755-0151, Japan.
Ube (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative delirium incidences are increasing in older adults. A Cochrane Review found no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative delirium between total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia (IA). This study evaluated the differences in postoperative delirium and morbidity between patients who underwent either TIVA or IA.

methodsA nationwide Japanese inpatient database was used to retrospectively compare differences in postoperative delirium and composite morbidity between patients older than 65 years, who underwent general anesthesia (TIVA or IA). The primary outcome was postoperative delirium. The secondary outcomes were: morbidity incidence, length of hospital stay, and mortality. A 1:3 propensity score analysis of patients who underwent all surgical procedures was conducted according to covariates, to calculate odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using an instrumental variable analysis of the proportion of TIVA by hospital scale, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses, limiting the definitions of postoperative delirium, and subgroup analysis.

resultsOf 738,600 patients, 149,540 received TIVA and 589,060 received IA. After 1:3 propensity score matching, the adjusted odds ratios for postoperative delirium and composite morbidity were 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.97), respectively, for TIVA concerning IA. There were no differences in the length of the intensive care unit and hospital stay, or hospital mortality. The findings were consistent with the sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that TIVA was related to a slightly decreased postoperative delirium and incidence of morbidity compared to IA.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationDeliriumPropofolAgedAnesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, IntravenousHumansRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolInhalational anesthesiaPostoperative deliriumTotal intravenous anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID36048263
OpenAlexW4294031714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.