Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048251›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2022

Policy and public communication methods among U.S. state prisons during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Melissa J Zielinski, Mariah Cowell, Chelsey E Bull, Manasa Veluvolu, M Forrest Behne, Kathryn Nowotny, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19 dynamics in an Ohio prison.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa J ZielinskiPsychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. MJZielinski@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1125-110X
Mariah CowellDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chelsey E BullPsychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Manasa VeluvoluPsychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
M Forrest BehneDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kathryn NowotnyDepartment of Sociology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Lauren Brinkley-RubinsteinDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

The Lifespan/Brown Criminal Justice Research Program on Substance Use and HIVR25DA037190 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
Leveraging Implementation Science to Increase Access to Trauma Treatment for Incarcerated Drug UsersK23DA048162 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI ZIELINSKI, MELISSA JEAN · 2019 to 2023
$811k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA048162NIDA NIH HHS K23DA048162NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037190NIDA NIH HHS R25DA037190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThroughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, our research team monitored and documented policy changes in United States (U.S.) prison systems. Data sources included prison websites and official prison social media accounts. Over 2500 data sources relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic in U.S. prisons were located and summarized in to five different categories: 1) prevention, 2) case identification and intervention, 3) movement, 4) social communication and connection, and 5) programming, recreation, and privileges.

resultsAll state prison systems reportedly enacted multiple policies intended to limit the spread of COVID-19 during the pandemic. Document analysis revealed that the most commonly released policies were restrictions on social contacts and privileges, basic preventive measures (e.g., distribution of masks), and basic case identification measures (e.g., verbal screening and temperature checks). Utilization of social media for policy communication varied significantly across states, though relevant data was more often released on Facebook than Twitter.

conclusionsTogether, our work provides foundational knowledge on the wide breadth of policies that were reportedly enacted in the first year of the pandemic that may be used as a base for quantitative work on policy effectiveness and examinations of implementation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Infection controlPolicyPrisonVisitation

Identifiers

PMID36048251
PMCPMC9435413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.