Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048101›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2022

Friends' discussions of interpersonal and noninterpersonal problems during early and middle adolescence: Associations with co-rumination.

Amanda J Rose, Rhiannon L Smith, Rebecca A Schwartz-Mette, Gary C Glick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda J RoseDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-8094
Rhiannon L SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut.
Rebecca A Schwartz-MetteDepartment of Psychology, University of Maine.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-0389
Gary C GlickDepartment of Psychology, Marist College.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-7421

Funding

Co-Rumination and Adjustment: A Multi-Method AssessmentR01MH073590 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROSE, AMANDA J · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Friendships are important sources of support during adolescence. However, a growing literature indicates some adolescents co-ruminate, or talk with friends about problems in a way that is excessive, speculative, and negatively focused, which confers risk for internalizing problems. Still, previous research had not examined the types of problems co-ruminators discuss. Using self-reported co-rumination and observations of friends' conversations about problems, the present study of early and middle adolescents addressed this gap. Participants (

Indexed as

FriendsInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentCommunicationFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36048101
PMCPMC9758691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.