Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36048065›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2022

Attentional priority is determined by predicted feature distributions.

Phillip P Witkowski, Joy J Geng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early Cortical Sensitivity and Speeded Target Selection Underlie Incidentally Learned Prioritization of Visual Features.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distractor similarity and category variability effects in search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Searching near and far: The attentional template incorporates viewing distance.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phillip P WitkowskiCenter for Mind and Brain.ORCID 0000-0001-7377-1592
Joy J GengCenter for Mind and Brain.ORCID 0000-0001-5663-9637

Funding

Quantifying the attentional templateR01MH113855 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GENG, JOY JIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual attention is often characterized as being guided by precise memories for target objects. However, real-world search targets have dynamic features that vary over time, meaning that observers must predict how the target

Indexed as

CuesHumansProbabilityReaction TimeUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID36048065
PMCPMC10249461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.