ReviewCancer science2022
Paving the road to make chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy effective against solid tumors.
Review in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge mapping and research trends of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy in breast cancer: A bibliometric and visual analytics study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- CAR-T cells co-expressing IL-7 and CCL19 promote epitope spreading to enhance antitumor immunity.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- Gene expression profiling of recipient immune cells induced by 7 × 19 CAR-T cell dosing in a syngeneic mouse model.PloS one · 2026Article
- Advanced Strategies of CAR-T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors and Hematological Malignancies.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2024Review
- Paving the road to make chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy effective against solid tumors.Cancer science · 2022Review
- Editorial: Complexity of tumor microenvironment: A major culprit in cancer development.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three major standard therapies, that is, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have conventionally been applied to the treatments for cancers and have saved many patients. In addition, for intractable, refractory, or advanced malignancies that cannot be cured by the three standard therapies, immunotherapy is an important subject of basic and clinical researches. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) has shown significant therapeutic efficacies on some types of tumors in large-scale randomized clinical trials, making a major impact on clinical oncology by scientifically proving and establishing the effectiveness of an immunotherapy. In 2018, ICI was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and immunotherapy is now becoming the "fourth" standard therapy for cancers. Recently, adoptive cell therapies, in which genetically modified T cells with enhanced reactivity against tumors are infused into the patients, have been attracting considerable attention as a hopeful immunotherapy following ICI. Particularly, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies demonstrate marked therapeutic efficacies against some hematologic malignancies, and have been approved in many countries. However, current CAR-T-cell therapy is considered to be little effective against solid tumors, which is one of the challenging issues to be overcome in CAR-T-cell therapy. In this review, we at first introduce CAR and CAR-T cell, and then focus on the recent progress of CAR-T-cell therapy against solid tumors as well as the novel concept on a role of CAR-T cells, aiming to further understandings of the novel cancer immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.