Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36047538›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2024

Development and Validation of Inpatient Hypoglycemia Models Centered Around the Insulin Ordering Process.

Aileen P Wright, Peter J Embi, Scott D Nelson, Joshua C Smith, Alexander Turchin, Dara E Mize

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aileen P WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7550-4284
Peter J EmbiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Scott D NelsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1941-1817
Joshua C SmithDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alexander TurchinDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-564X
Dara E MizeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe insulin ordering process is an opportunity to provide clinicians with hypoglycemia risk predictions, but few hypoglycemia models centered around the insulin ordering process exist.

methodsWe used data on adult patients, admitted in 2019 to non-ICU floors of a large teaching hospital, who had orders for subcutaneous insulin. Our outcome was hypoglycemia, defined as a blood glucose (BG) <70 mg/dL within 24 hours after ordering insulin. We trained and evaluated models to predict hypoglycemia at the time of placing an insulin order, using logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). We compared performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) and precision-recall curves. We determined recall at our goal precision of 0.30.

resultsOf 21 052 included insulin orders, 1839 (9%) were followed by a hypoglycemic event within 24 hours. Logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models had AUCs of 0.81, 0.80, and 0.79, and recall of 0.44, 0.49, and 0.32, respectively. The most significant predictor was the lowest BG value in the 24 hours preceding the order. Predictors related to the insulin order being placed at the time of the prediction were useful to the model but less important than the patient's history of BG values over time.

conclusionsHypoglycemia within the next 24 hours can be predicted at the time an insulin order is placed, providing an opportunity to integrate decision support into the medication ordering process to make insulin therapy safer.

Indexed as

HypoglycemiaInsulinAdultBlood GlucoseHumansInpatientsInsulin, Regular, HumanBlood GlucoseInsulinInsulin, Regular, Humanclinical decision supporthypoglycemiainsulinmachine learningpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID36047538
PMCPMC10973866
OpenAlexW4294086367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.