Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36047478›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2023

Identifying targets for interventions to support public use of face coverings.

Christopher J Armitage, Chris Keyworth, Nicola Gartland, Anna Coleman, David Fishwick, Sheena Johnson, Martie van Tongeren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Theory-based Trial to Promote Uptake and Sustained Use of Face Coverings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of the Face Mask Use by Public Transport Passengers and Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-1765
Chris KeyworthDepartment of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nicola GartlandCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anna ColemanCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David FishwickCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sheena JohnsonAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Martie van TongerenCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

PROTECT COVID-19 National Core Study on transmission and environment, managed by the Health and Safety Executive on behalf of HM Government and supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInterventions to promote the wearing of face coverings if required in the future can only be developed if we know why people do or do not wear them. Study aims were, therefore, to assess public adherence to wearing face coverings to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and to gauge why people were or were not wearing face coverings in work, public transport, and indoor leisure settings.

designCross-sectional survey.

methods10,622 adults (25 January-6 February 2022) who were representative of the UK population were asked about their (a) wearing of face coverings in work, public transport, and leisure settings; (b) sociodemographic characteristics; and (c) perceptions of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations ("COM-B"). Data were analysed descriptively, using within-participants ANOVA and multiple linear regression.

resultsParticipants reported mostly wearing face coverings in public transport settings (>80%), but substantially less in work (<50%) and leisure (<30%) contexts. Perceptions of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to wear face coverings were consistently associated with the actual wearing of face coverings across the three settings, but there were marked deficits in automatic motivation and social opportunity. People living in England, describing themselves as White, and men were least likely to wear face coverings.

conclusionsInterventions targeted at men, people living in England, and those describing themselves as White that focus on increasing capabilities, providing greater opportunities and boosting motivations are suggested to promote the wearing of face coverings, with particular focus on addressing automatic motivation and social opportunity.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHumansMaleMotivationSARS-CoV-2adherenceCOVID-19face coveringface maskinterventionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36047478
PMCPMC10087948
OpenAlexW4294127630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.