Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36047376›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gynecologic oncology2022

Randomized comparison between sentinel lymph node mapping using indocyanine green plus a fluorescent camera versus lymph node dissection in clinical stage I-II endometrial cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (KGOG2029/SELYE).

Jeong-Yeol Park, Ju-Hyun Kim, Min-Hyun Baek, Eunhyang Park, Sang Wun Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04845828 (Prospective Randomized Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Using Indocyanine Green and Conventional Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04845828 narecruitingnot on this map

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Using Indocyanine Green and Conventional Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2022 to 2029Enrolled810ConditionsEndometrial CancerArmsSentinel lymph node mapping, Routine lymph node dissection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong-Yeol ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. catgut1-0@hanmail.net.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-7123
Ju-Hyun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-5739
Min-Hyun BaekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-9038
Eunhyang ParkDepartment of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2658-5054
Sang Wun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-8701
Ulsan College · KRYonsei University · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

PROVIDE RABBITS, RATS MICE, HAMSTERS GERBILS, GUINEA PIGS27307C0012 · NIEHS · PI BOLEN, WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$1.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has been suggested as an alternative surgical technique to full lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer. However, the survival outcomes of SLN mapping compared with lymphadenectomy have not been established via a prospective study.

methodsA multi-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial has been designed to determine the prognostic value of SLN mapping alone compared with conventional lymphadenectomy for patients with clinical stage I-II endometrial cancer. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio between the group to undergo SLN mapping using indocyanine green and the conventional lymph node dissection group. A high-risk group will undergo a 2-step SLN mapping procedure. The primary endpoint is the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints are 3-year overall survival (OS), 5-year DFS, 5-year OS after surgery, pattern of recurrence, immediate surgical outcomes, success rate of SLN mapping, postoperative lymph-related complications, postoperative quality of life, and postoperative cost effectiveness. The role of pathologic ultrastaging of SLNs will also be assessed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT number): NCT04845828.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph NodeColoring AgentsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRepublic of KoreaSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySingle-Blind MethodColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenEndometrial CancerIndocyanine GreenLymphadenectomyPrognosisSentinel Lymph Node

Identifiers

PMID36047376
PMCPMC9634095
OpenAlexW4289354628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.