ArticleHuman mutation2022
Phasing of de novo mutations using a scaled-up multiple amplicon long-read sequencing approach.
Article in Human mutation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paternal age effect in autosomal dominant or X-linked de novo variants identified by genome-wide sequencing.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Long-read sequencing of families reveals increased germline and postzygotic mutation rates in repetitive DNA.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Long-range PCR and Nanopore sequencing for localisation and phasing variants: an end-to-end clinical application workflow.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Novel Genes of the Male Reproductive System: Potential Roles in Male Reproduction and as Non-hormonal Male Contraceptive Targets.Molecular reproduction and development · 2024Review
- Post-implantation analysis of genomic variations in the progeny from developing fetus to birth.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Molecular cytogenetic analysis of multi-miscarriage products of conception in clinical cases from Al-Anbar Governorate, west of Iraq.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Article
- Phasing of de novo mutations using a scaled-up multiple amplicon long-read sequencing approach.Human mutation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
De novo mutations (DNMs) play an important role in severe genetic disorders that reduce fitness. To better understand their role in disease, it is important to determine the parent-of-origin and timing of mutational events that give rise to these mutations, especially in sex-specific developmental disorders such as male infertility. However, currently available short-read sequencing approaches are not ideally suited for phasing, as this requires long continuous DNA strands that span both the DNM and one or more informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms. To overcome these challenges, we optimized and implemented a multiplexed long-read sequencing approach using Oxford Nanopore technologies MinION platform. We focused on improving target amplification, integrating long-read sequenced data with high-quality short-read sequence data, and developing an anchored phasing computational method. This approach handled the inherent phasing challenges of long-range target amplification and the normal accumulation of sequencing error associated with long-read sequencing. In total, 77 of 109 DNMs (71%) were successfully phased and parent-of-origin identified. The majority of phased DNMs were prezygotic (90%), the accuracy of which is highlighted by an average mutant allele frequency of 49.6% and standard error of 0.84%. This study demonstrates the benefits of employing an integrated short-read and long-read sequencing approach for large-scale DNM phasing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.