Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36047083›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

'Single-handed care' initiatives and reviews of double-handed homecare packages: A survey of practices in English local authorities with adult social care responsibilities.

Phillip J Whitehead, Leigh Rooney, Jane Adams-Thomas, Catherine Bailey, Marie Greenup, Carole Southall, Anne Raffle, Tim Rapley, Stephanie Whittington

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip J WhiteheadPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Leigh RooneyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jane Adams-ThomasOccupational Therapy Team, Nottingham City Council, Nottingham, UK.
Catherine BaileyDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Marie GreenupOccupational Therapy Team, Sunderland City Council, Sunderland, UK.
Carole SouthallDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anne RaffleElders Council, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Tim RapleyDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Stephanie WhittingtonDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Northumbria University · GBNewcastle University · GBElders of Newscastle Upon Tyne · GBNottingham City Council · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International health and social care systems are experiencing unprecedented pressure and demand. 'Single-handed care' initiatives seek to identify whether all or part of a homecare package involving more than one care worker can be safely reduced to a single worker. Little is known about these initiatives across local authorities. The aim of this study was to identify, describe and explain current processes and practices for single-handed care initiatives and double-handed homecare reviews. An electronic survey link was sent to each local authority with social care responsibilities in England. The questions covered a range of areas in relation to single-handed care processes and included a combination of pre-coded and free-text responses. Responses were received from 76 (50%) local authorities. Findings were that over 12,000 reviews were reported within a year with a median of 141 (IQR 45-280) from 53 authorities that provided figures. Reviews were usually led by a local authority occupational therapist. On average, 540 min was spent per review, including conducting and organising the review, documentation, and travel. In nearly half the authorities, double handed care remained at least partially in place following at least 80% of the reviews and remained wholly in place following at least 60%. Local authorities also reported some resistance from homecare providers when implementing single-handed care. The findings have confirmed anecdotal evidence that reviews of double-handed homecare packages are common practice within local authorities. Given the amount of time taken with these reviews, and paucity of evidence on outcomes for people receiving them, further research should evaluate this.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesAdultEnglandHumansSocial Supportdouble-handed carehomecaremoving and handlingsingle-handed caresocial care

Identifiers

PMID36047083
PMCPMC10087553
OpenAlexW4294126958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.