Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36047079›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2023

Initial Longitudinal Outcomes of Risk-Stratified Men in Their Forties Screened for Prostate Cancer Following Implementation of a Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen.

Zoe D Michael, Srinath Kotamarti, Rohith Arcot, Kostantinos Morris, Anand Shah, John Anderson, Andrew J Armstrong, Rajan T Gupta, Steven Patierno, Nadine J Barrett and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zoe D Michael *The Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-0341
Srinath Kotamarti *The Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1392-9102
Rohith ArcotThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-915X
Kostantinos MorrisThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-353X
Anand ShahThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-5369
John AndersonThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-6079
Andrew J ArmstrongThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7012-1754
Rajan T GuptaThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-5010
Steven PatiernoThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0636-2128
Nadine J BarrettThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-5209
Daniel J GeorgeThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-8542
Glenn M PremingerThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4287-602X
Judd W MoulThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9228-8344
Kevin C OeffingerThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-7894
Kevin ShahThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6938-698X
Thomas J PolascikThe Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3666-1372
Duke Cancer Institute Planning Committee for Prostate Cancer Screening
Prostate Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate cancer (PCa) screening can lead to potential over-diagnosis/over-treatment of indolent cancers. There is a need to optimize practices to better risk-stratify patients. We examined initial longitudinal outcomes of mid-life men with an elevated baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following initiation of a novel screening program within a system-wide network. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe assessed our primary care network patients ages 40 to 49 years with a PSA measured following implementation of an electronic health record screening algorithm from 2/2/2017-2/21/2018. The multidisciplinary algorithm was developed taking factors including age, race, family history, and PSA into consideration to provide a personalized approach to urology referral to be used with shared decision-making. Outcomes of men with PSA ≥1.5 ng/mL were evaluated through 7/2021. Statistical analyses identified factors associated with PCa detection. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as Gleason Grade Group (GGG) ≥2 or GGG1 with PSA ≥10 ng/mL.

resultsThe study cohort contained 564 patients, with 330 (58.5%) referred to urology for elevated PSA. Forty-nine (8.7%) underwent biopsy; of these, 20 (40.8%) returned with PCa. Eleven (2.0% of total cohort and 55% of PCa diagnoses) had csPCa. Early referral timing (odds ratio [OR], 4.58) and higher PSA (OR, 1.07) were significantly associated with PCa at biopsy on multivariable analysis (both p<0.05), while other risk factors were not. Referred patients had higher mean PSAs (2.97

conclusionsPreliminary outcomes following implementation of a multidisciplinary screening algorithm identified PCa in a small, important percentage of men in their forties. These results provide insight into baseline PSA measurement to provide early risk stratification and detection of csPCa in patients with otherwise extended life expectancy. Further follow-up is needed to possibly determine the prognostic significance of such mid-life screening and optimize primary care physician-urologist coordination.

Indexed as

Primary careProstate cancerProstate specific antigenScreening

Identifiers

PMID36047079
PMCPMC10307649
OpenAlexW4294126500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.