Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36047064›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery2022

Optimal treatment occasion for ultrasound stimulated microbubbles in promoting gemcitabine delivery to VX2 tumors.

Tingting Luo, Luhua Bai, Yi Zhang, Leidan Huang, Hui Li, Shunji Gao, Xiaoxiao Dong, Ningshan Li, Zheng Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Science advances · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tingting LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Luhua BaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Leidan HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shunji GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Central Theatre Command, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoxiao DongDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ningshan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zheng LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xinqiao Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Central Theater CommandShenzhen Second People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound stimulated microbubbles (USMB) is a widely used technology that can promote chemotherapeutic delivery to tumors yet the best treatment occasion for USMB is unknown or ignored. We aimed to determine the optimal treatment occasion for USMB treatment to enhance tumor chemotherapy to achieve the highest drug concentration in tumors. Experiments were conducted on VX2 tumors implanted in 60 rabbits. Gemcitabine (GEM) was intravenously infused as a chemotherapeutic agent and USMB was administered before, during or after chemotherapy. USMB was conducted with a modified diagnostic ultrasound at 3 MHz employing short bursts (5 cycles and 0.125% duty cycle) at 0.26 MPa in combination with a lipid microbubble. Subsequently, tumor blood perfusion quantitation, drug concentration detection, and fluorescence microscopy were performed. The results showed that the group that received USMB treatment immediately after GEM infusion had the highest drug concentration in tumors, which was 2.83 times that of the control group. Fifteen tumors were then treated repeatedly with the optimal USMB-plus-GEM combination, and along with the GEM and the control groups, were studied for tumor growth, tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and related cytokine contents. The combined treatment significantly inhibited tumor growth and promoted apoptosis. The levels of related cytokines, including HIF-1α, decreased after six combination therapies. These results suggest that the optimal treatment occasion for USMB occurs immediately after chemotherapy and tumor hypoxia improves after multiple combination therapies.

Indexed as

DeoxycytidineMicrobubblesAnimalsCell Line, TumorGemcitabineRabbitsUltrasonographyDeoxycytidineGemcitabinechemotherapydiagnostic ultrasounddrug concentrationmicrobubblestreatment occasion

Identifiers

PMID36047064
PMCPMC9448370
OpenAlexW4294118781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.