ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022
Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Infection in Intensive Care Unit and Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Using Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid and Blood Samples in Patients with Severe Pneumonia Complicated with Bloodstream Infection.Polish journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Successful azithromycin treatment ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Single Daily versus Multiple-Daily Sputum Cultures for Guiding Antibiotic Therapy in ICU Patients with Pulmonary Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants and potential co-infected pathogens in hospitalized patients based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Significance of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Immunocompromised Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Infection.Immunology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples for pathogen detection in children with severe or refractory pneumonia.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Challenges of Six-Pathogen Detected by mNGS in an Immunocompromised ICU Patient with Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia-Induced Sepsis: A Case Report and Literature Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Microbiological Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Effect of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Immunocompromised Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Impact of molecular diagnostic techniques on the acute respiratory infection sentinel surveillance program, Antioquia, Colombia, 2022.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and culture in pathogen detection among intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients with suspected pulmonary infection. Methods: In this prospective study, sputum samples were collected from patients with suspected pulmonary infection for 2 consecutive days and then subjected to DNA or RNA sequencing by mNGS or culture; 62 ICU patients and 60 non-ICU patients were admitted. In the end, comparisons were made on the pathogen species identified by mNGS and culture, the overall performance of these two methods in pathogen detection, and the most common pathogens detected by mNGS between the ICU and non-ICU groups. Results: In DNA and RNA sequencing, the positive rate of pathogen detection reached 96.69% (117/121) and 96.43% (108/112), respectively. In culture tests, the positive rate of the pathogen was 39.34% (48/122), much lower than that of DNA and RNA sequencing. In general, the positive rate of pathogen detection by sputum mNGS was significantly higher than that of sputum culture in the total and non-ICU groups (p < 0.001) but did not show a significant difference when compared to the result of sputum culture in the ICU group (p = 0.08). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superiority of mNGS over culture in detecting all kinds of pathogen species in sputum samples. These results indicate that mNGS may serve as a valuable tool to identify pathogens, especially for ICU patients who are more susceptible to mixed infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.