ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2022
Delayed hemorrhage following deep brain stimulation device placement in a patient with Parkinson's disease and lupus anticoagulant syndrome: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed intracranial hemorrhage following deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Delayed Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment options for Parkinson's disease (PD) include both medical and surgical approaches. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical procedure that aims to improve motor symptomatology. OBSERVATIONS: A 66-year-old White male with a 9-year history of PD presented to the neurosurgery clinic for DBS consideration. On the morning of scheduled surgery, preoperative laboratory test results revealed a prolonged prothrombin time of 50 seconds. Surgery was postponed, and further work-up revealed that the patient had a positive test result for lupus anticoagulant (LA). DBS implantation was performed 2 months later. The first stage of surgery was uneventful. The patient returned 1 week later for the second stage. Postoperatively, the patient exhibited a diminished level of consciousness. Computed tomography revealed left frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage with surrounding edema, trace subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, and midline shift. LESSONS: The authors suspect that the hemorrhage occurred secondary to venous infarct, because LA is associated with a paradoxically increased risk of thrombosis. Although there is no documented association between LA and acute or delayed hemorrhage, this case demonstrates a possible relationship in a patient following DBS placement. More research is needed to confirm an association with coexisting LA with PD and an increased hemorrhage risk in neurosurgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.