ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2022
The Intersection of Antimicrobial Stewardship, the Pharmaceutical Industry, and the Federal Legislature.
Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Codesigned Approach to Develop Tailored Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies in Bangladesh: A Social-Ecological Systems Framework Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial stewardship and the antibiotic market: why "Reserve" drugs require new economic models.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Navigating and Advancing Market Access for In Vitro Diagnostics: Understanding the Roles of Key Stakeholders and Policy.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- An Australian perspective on clinical, economic and regulatory considerations in emerging nanoparticle therapies for infections.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- Challenges and opportunities for incentivising antibiotic research and development in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To mitigate the dangers of inappropriate antimicrobial use leading to increased multidrug-resistant organisms and mortality, antimicrobial stewardship programs have become a mainstay in many health systems. Unfortunately, some pharmaceutical manufacturers simultaneously have ended antimicrobial research and development efforts altogether due to suboptimal return on investments. An optimal and sustainable antimicrobial armamentarium requires a broad alliance between antimicrobial stewardship programs, the pharmaceutical industry, the legislature, and federal and state agencies. Public-private relationships such as the Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator (CARB-X) and legislative policies creating push and pull incentives, including the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN), Developing an Innovative Strategy for Antimicrobial-Resistant Microorganisms (DISARM), and Pioneering Antimicrobial Subscriptions to End Upsurging Resistance (PASTEUR) Acts, are each a step in the right direction, but more work remains. Understanding these legislative actions is imperative for all clinicians, as is teamwork from those involved in the antimicrobial field to develop and maintain the life cycle of each drug that harbors societal value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.