Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046635›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Digitization in health-related self-help - Results of an online survey among self-help organizations in Germany.

Stefan Nickel, Katharina Bremer, Marie-Luise Dierks, Marius Haack, Silke Wittmar, Bernhard Borgetto, Christopher Kofahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan NickelUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-7118
Katharina BremerMedical University Hanover, Germany.
Marie-Luise DierksMedical University Hanover, Germany.
Marius HaackMedical University Hanover, Germany.
Silke WittmarUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Goettingen, Germany.
Bernhard BorgettoUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Goettingen, Germany.
Christopher KofahlUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, much hope and expectations are associated with digitization in the health sector. The digital change also affects health-related self-help. A nationwide survey of self-help organizations (SHOs) aimed to show chances and limitations in the use of interactive IT tools like webforums, online meetings or social media as well as digital infrastructures for their organizational management. In this survey, we also determined whether SHO staff themselves have support and qualification needs with regard to this topic. Design: The online survey was conducted between 14 November and 8 December 2019, i.e., immediately before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. The questionnaire consisted of 50 questions consisting of 180 single items which could be answered in 30-40 min. After two reminder letters, 119 questionnaires of the SHOs were gathered and analysed. Results: SHOs already have a lot of experience with digital media/tools (e.g., own homepage, social media, cloud computing). Some tools are attested a "high" or "very high" benefit by more than 80% of users. Perceived benefits, however, are also facing a number of problems, ranging from lack of resources to data protection issues. Despite, or even because of the limits of digitization, there is great desire and need for support and further training in SHOs (and self-help groups). Conclusions: At many points in the survey it was shown that digital media can be a useful extension of "traditional" collective self-help. Taking into account the risks and limitations associated with digital tools, SHOs can be central stakeholders in digitization in health-related self-help. Patient or Public Contribution: The study was financially supported by the Federal Ministry of Health, Germany. A detailed representation of the results is publicly available at: https://www.uke.de/dish.

Indexed as

Digitizationmutual aidself-helpsocial mediasupport groups

Identifiers

PMID36046635
PMCPMC9421018
OpenAlexW4292827940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.